Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons
-
Published:2022-04-29
Issue:10
Volume:31
Page:3041-3048
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Mulhern Brendan J.,Sampson Chris,Haywood Phil,Addo Rebecca,Page Katie,Mott David,Shah Koonal,Janssen Mathieu F.,Herdman Mike
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
‘Bolt-on’ dimensions are additional items added to multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D that measure constructs not included in the core descriptive system. The use of bolt-ons has been proposed to improve the content validity and responsiveness of the descriptive system in certain settings and health conditions. EQ-5D bolt-ons serve a particular purpose and thus satisfy a certain set of criteria. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of criteria to guide the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-on descriptors.
Methods
Criteria were developed using an iterative approach. First, existing criteria were identified from the literature including those used to guide the development of MAUIs, the COSMIN checklist and reviews of existing bolt-ons. Second, processes used to develop bolt-ons based on qualitative and quantitative approaches were considered. The information from these two stages was formalised into draft development and selection criteria. These were reviewed by the project team and iteratively refined.
Results
Overall, 23 criteria for the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-ons were formulated. Development criteria focused on issues relating to i) structure, ii) language, and iii) consistency with the existing EQ-5D dimension structure. Assessment and selection criteria focused on face and content validity and classical psychometric indicators.
Conclusion
The criteria generated can be used to guide the development of bolt-ons across different health areas. They can also be used to assess existing bolt-ons, and inform their inclusion in studies and patient groups where the EQ-5D may lack content validity.
Funder
EuroQol Research Foundation University of Technology Sydney
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference23 articles.
1. Kennedy-Martin, M., Slaap, B., Herdman, M., van Reenen, M., Kennedy-Martin, T., Greiner, W., Busschbach, J., & Boye, K. (2020). Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. European Journal of Health Economics, 21, 1245–57. 2. Brazier, J., Connell, J., Papaioannou, D., Mukuria, C., Mulhern, B., Peasgood, T., Lloyd-Jones, M., Paisley, S., O’Cathain, A., Barkham, M., Knapp, M., Byford, S., Gilbody, S., & Parry, G. (2014). A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Health Technology Assessment, 18, 34. 3. Mulhern, B., Mukuria, C., Barkham, M., Knapp, M., Byford, S., Soeteman, D., & Brazier, J. (2014). Using preference-based measures in mental health conditions: The psychometric validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D. British Journal of Psychiatry, 205(3), 236–243. 4. Longworth, L., Yang, Y., Young, T., Mulhern, B., Hernandez-Alava, M., Mukuria, C., Rowen, D., Tosh, J., Tsuchiya, A., & Evans, P. (2014). Use of generic and condition specific measures of health-related quality of life in NICE decision making: Systematic review, statistical modelling and survey. Health Technology Assessment, 18, 9. 5. Shah, K., Mulhern, B., Longworth, L., & Janssen, M. F. (2017). Views of the UK general public on important aspects of health not captured by EQ-5D. The Patient, 10(6), 701–709.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|