1. Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Cook, K., Cella, D., Narasimhalu, K., Hays, R., & Teresi, J. A comparison of two sets of criteria for determining the presence of differential item functioning using ordinal logistic regression. Quality of Life Research, this issue.
2. Teresi, J. A., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Kleinman, M., Cook, K. F., Crane, P., Gibbons, L. E., Morales, L. S., Orlando-Edelen, M., & Cella, D. Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF):Applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress. Quality of Life Research, this issue.
3. Camilli, G., & Shepard, L. A. (1994). Methods for identifying biased test items. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
4. Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Millsap, R. E., & Everson, H. T. (1993). Methodology review: Statistical approaches for assessing measurement bias. Applied Psychological Measurement, 17, 297–334.