Life satisfaction 18 months and 10 years following spinal cord injury: results from a New Zealand prospective cohort study
-
Published:2023-01-26
Issue:4
Volume:32
Page:1015-1030
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Dixon Ruby, Derrett SarahORCID, Samaranayaka Ari, Harcombe Helen, Wyeth Emma H., Beaver Carolyn, Sullivan Martin
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To examine the life satisfaction outcomes after spinal cord injury (SCI) and to identify the factors associated with life satisfaction at 18 months and 10 years post-SCI in New Zealand (NZ).
Methods
Adults (16–64 years) were recruited between 2007 and 2009 from NZ’s two spinal units following first admission for SCI. Interviews at 6 months, 18 months, and 10 years post-SCI examined demographic, physical, psychosocial, economic, and environmental characteristics. Multivariable regression models were used to identify predictors of life satisfaction at each timepoint.
Results
Overall, 118 people participated at 6 months, 103 at 18 months, and 63 at 10 years post-SCI. Pre-SCI, 90% of participants were satisfied with life, 67% were satisfied at 18 months, and 78% at 10 years. At 18 months post-SCI, participants who reported: never or sometimes using a wheelchair, no problems with self-care, no problems with anxiety or depression, no/lesser disability, or fewer secondary health conditions (SHCs) at 6 months post-SCI were more likely to be satisfied (p < 0.05), compared to those without these characteristics. Participants who experienced considerable disability at 6 months post-SCI were 22% less likely to be satisfied 10 years post-SCI compared to those experiencing no/lesser disability (p = 0.028).
Conclusions
A higher proportion of participants were satisfied at both 18 months and 10 years post-SCI than not satisfied. To improve the likelihood of satisfaction with life, increased focus on reducing disability and providing supports for those using wheelchairs, experiencing anxiety/depression or problems with self-care, and effects of SHCs are promising for future potential interventions.
Funder
Health Research Council of New Zealand Rob Porter Educational Fund in Spinal Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference56 articles.
1. Kirshblum, S. C., Biering-Sorensen, F., Betz, R., Burns, S., Donovan, W., Graves, D. E., Johansen, M., Jones, L., Mulcahey, M. J., Rodriguez, G. M., Schmidt-Read, M., Steeves, J. D., Tansey, K., & Waring, W. (2014). International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: Cases with classification challenges. The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, 37(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000196 2. Ahuja, C. S., Wilson, J. R., Nori, S., Kotter, M., Druschel, C., Curt, A., & Fehlings, M. G. (2017). Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 3(1), 1–21. 3. World Health Organization, & International Spinal Cord Society. (2013). International Perspectives on Spinal Cord Injury. World Health Organization. 4. New Zealand Spinal Cord Injury Registry. (2021). New Zealand Spinal Cord Injury Registry Annual Summary Report 2020. 5. Derrett, S., Beaver, C., Sullivan, M. J., Herbison, G. P., Acland, R., & Paul, C. (2012). Traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord impairment in New Zealand: Incidence and characteristics of people admitted to spinal units. Injury Prevention, 18(5), 343–346. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040266
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|