Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
To identify whether it is feasible to develop a mapping algorithm to predict presenteeism using multiattribute measures of health status.
Methods
Data were collected using a bespoke online survey in a purposive sample (n = 472) of working individuals with a self-reported diagnosis of Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Survey respondents were recruited using an online panel company (ResearchNow). This study used data captured using two multiattribute measures of health status (EQ5D-5 level; SF6D) and a measure of presenteeism (WPAI, Work Productivity Activity Index). Statistical correlation between the WPAI and the two measures of health status (EQ5D-5 level; SF6D) was assessed using Spearman’s rank correlation. Five regression models were estimated to quantify the relationship between WPAI and predict presenteeism using health status. The models were specified based in index and domain scores and included covariates (age; gender). Estimated and observed presenteeism were compared using tenfold cross-validation and evaluated using Root mean square error (RMSE).
Results
A strong and negative correlation was found between WPAI and: EQ5D-5 level and WPAI (r = − 0.64); SF6D (r =− 0.60). Two models, using ordinary least squares regression were identified as the best performing models specifying health status using: SF6D domains with age interacted with gender (RMSE = 1.7858); EQ5D-5 Level domains and age interacted with gender (RMSE = 1.7859).
Conclusions
This study provides indicative evidence that two existing measures of health status (SF6D and EQ5D-5L) have a quantifiable relationship with a measure of presenteeism (WPAI) for an exemplar application of working individuals with RA. A future study should assess the external validity of the proposed mapping algorithms.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference45 articles.
1. Mattke, S., Balakrishnan, A., Bergamo, G., & Newberry, S. J. (2007). A review of methods to measure health-related productivity loss. The American Journal of Managed Care, 13(4), 211–217.
2. Boles, M., Pelletier, B., & Lynch, W. (2004). The relationship between health risks and work productivity. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 46(7), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000131830.45744.97
3. Loeppke, R., Hymel, P. A., Lofland, J. H., Pizzi, L. T., Konicki D. L., Anstadt, G. W., Baase, C., Fortuna, J., Scharf, T. (2003). American college of occupational and environmental medicine. Health-related workplace productivity measurement: General and migraine-specific recommendations from the ACOEM Expert Panel. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45(4), 349–59 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000063619.37065.e2. Erratum in: Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 45(9), 940
4. Brunner, B., Igic, I., Keller, A. C., & Wieser, S. (2019). Who gains the most from improving working conditions? Health-related absenteeism and presenteeism due to stress at work. European Journal of Health Economics, 20(8), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-019-01084-9
5. ZIN – (Zorginstituut Nederland). (2016). Guidelines for economic evaluations in healthcare
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献