Development of the Patient Scale of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 3.0: a qualitative study
-
Published:2022-11-10
Issue:2
Volume:32
Page:583-592
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Carrière M. E.,Mokkink L. B.,Tyack Z.,Westerman M. J.,Pijpe A.,Pleat J.,van de Kar A. L.,Brown J.,de Vet H. C. W.,van Zuijlen P. P. M.
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) is widely used for measurements of scar quality. This encompasses visual, tactile and sensory characteristics of the scar. The Patient Scale of previous POSAS versions was lacking input from patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop the POSAS3.0, Patient Scale with involvement of adults patients with all scar types, complying with the highest clinimetric standards.
Methods
From February 2018 to April 2019, a series of six focus group interviews were performed in the Netherlands and Australia to identify scar quality characteristics that adults with scars consider to be important. All focus groups were transcribed, anonymized and analysed using a thematic analysis. Relevant characteristics were formulated into items, resulting in a Dutch and English version of the Patient Scale. These drafts were pilot tested in Australia, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, and refined accordingly.
Results
A total of 21 relevant scar quality characteristics were identified during the focus groups. Two distinct versions of the POSAS3.0, Patient Scale were developed. The Generic version contains 16 items and can be used for all scar types, except linear scars. The Linear Scar version of the Patient Scale contains the same 16 items, with an extra item referring to the widening of scar margins. All included items are rated on a verbal rating scale with five response options.
Conclusion
Two versions of the POSAS3.0 Patient Scale were developed. Further field tests are being performed to establish the measurement properties and scoring algorithm of the scales.
Funder
Nederlandse Brandwonden Stichting
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference26 articles.
1. van der Wal, M. B., Verhaegen, P. D., Middelkoop, E., & van Zuijlen, P. P. (2012). A clinimetric overview of scar assessment scales. Journal of Burn Care & Research, 33(2), e79-87. https://doi.org/10.1097/BCR.0b013e318239f5dd 2. Carrière, M. E., Kwa, K. A. A., de Haas, L. E. M., Pijpe, A., Tyack, Z., Ket, J. C. F., van Zuijlen, P. P. M., de Vet, H. C. W., & Mokkink, L. B. (2019). Systematic review on the content of outcome measurement instruments on scar quality. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open, 7(9), e2424. https://doi.org/10.1097/gox.0000000000002424 3. Eskes, A. M., Brolmann, F. E., van de Kar, A. L., Niessen, F. B., Lindeboom, R., Ubbink, D. T., & Vermeulen, H. (2012). Values of patients and caregivers for donor site scars: An inter-observer analysis between patients and caregivers and prediction of cosmetic satisfaction. Burns, 38(6), 796–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2012.04.011 4. Martin, D., Umraw, N., Gomez, M., & Cartotto, R. (2003). Changes in subjective vs objective burn scar assessment over time: Does the patient agree with what we think? The Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation, 24(4), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Bcr.0000075842.55039.03 discussion 238. 5. Collins, L. K., Knackstedt, T. J., Ganger, P., Scherer, E., & Samie, F. H. (2017). Applying a visual assessment tool to facial linear scars. Facial Plastic Surgery, 33(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597684
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|