The Personalized Priority and Progress Questionnaire (PPPQ): A personalized instrument for quality of life and self-management for use in clinical trials and practice
-
Published:2023-05-12
Issue:10
Volume:32
Page:2789-2803
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Tommel JudithORCID, Cardol Cinderella K.ORCID, Evers Andrea W. M.ORCID, Stuivenberg Rianne, van Dijk SandraORCID, van Middendorp HenriëtORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to develop and validate a brief personalized instrument that (1) defines patients’ priorities for improvement, (2) measures progress in prioritized quality of life (QoL) and self-management outcomes, and (3) is applicable in both clinical practice and clinical trials.
Methods
The instrument was developed based on the literature on personalized assessment and patient priorities, feedback by clinicians, and six cognitive interviews with patients with chronic kidney disease. The resulting questionnaire, the Personalized Priority and Progress Questionnaire (PPPQ), contains a baseline and follow-op measurement. The baseline measurement assesses functioning on QoL (8 items) and self-management (5 items). The final item evaluates patients’ priorities for improvement. The follow-up measurement assesses progress in QoL and self-management. A personalized progress score can be calculated indicating the amount of progress on the QoL or self-management domain that is prioritized by the individual patient. Psychometric properties of the PPPQ were evaluated among patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 121) and patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis (n = 22).
Results
The PPPQ showed to be a feasible instrument that is easy and quick to complete. Regarding the construct validity, small to large correlations were found between the items and existing validated questionnaires measuring related constructs.
Conclusion
The PPPQ proved to be a feasible and valid instrument. The PPPQ can be adapted to match diverse populations and could be a useful tool both in clinical practice (e.g., to identify priorities and tailor treatment) and clinical trials (e.g., to evaluate the effectiveness of personalized interventions).
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference60 articles.
1. González, A. M., Gutman, T., Lopez-Vargas, P., Anumudu, S., Arce, C. M., Craig, J. C., Dunn, L., Eckardt, K.-U., Harris, T., & Levey, A. S. (2020). Patient and caregiver priorities for outcomes in CKD: A multinational nominal group technique study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 76(5), 679–689. 2. Tommel, J., Evers, A. W. M., van Hamersvelt, H. W., Jordens, R., van Dijk, S., Hilbrands, L. B., Hermans, M. M. H., Hollander, D. A. M. J., van de Kerkhof, J. J., ten Dam, M. A. G. J., & van Middendorp, H. (2023). “What matters to you?”: The relevance of patient priorities in dialysis care for assessment and clinical practice. Seminars in Dialysis, 36, 131–141. 3. Burgers, J. S., van der Weijden, T., & Bischoff, E. W. (2021). Challenges of research on person-centered care in general practice: A scoping review. Frontiers in Medicine, 8, 669491. 4. Sacristán, J. A., & Knottnerus, J. A. (2021). Individual point-of-care trials: A new approach to incorporate patient’s preferences into personalized pragmatic clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 130, 152–155. 5. Zeh, S., Christalle, E., Zill, J. M., Härter, M., Block, A., & Scholl, I. (2021). What do patients expect? Assessing patient-centredness from the patients’ perspective: An interview study. British Medical Journal Open, 11(7), e047810.
|
|