Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Author:

Calderon CaterinaORCID,Ferrando Pere J.,Lorenzo-Seva Urbano,Ferreira Estrella,Lee Eun Mi,Oporto-Alonso Marta,Obispo-Portero Berta M.,Mihic-Góngora Luka,Rodríguez-González Adan,Jiménez-Fonseca Paula

Abstract

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was to analyze the internal structure of the EORTC QLQ-C30, to examine the validity and normative data for cancer patients. Method Exploratory and Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to explore the scale’s dimensionality and test for strong measurement invariance across sex and tumor site. All the analyses were based on a multicenter cohort of 931 patients who completed the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) and the EORTC QLQ-C30. Results Our findings indicate that the EORTC QLQ-C30 has acceptable psychometric properties and an internal structure that is well accounted for a bifactor model: a general factor that evaluates quality of life and a group factor that would analyze physical health that would be defined by physical function, role function, and fatigue. The result of the multi-group CFA revealed a strong invariance according to sex, tumor, and over time. Reliability of the EORTC exceeding 0.86 and the simple sum of the items of the scale was a good indicator of oncology patients’ quality of life. Both factors correlate closely with depression, anxiety, and psychological distress and are sensitive to change, especially the quality of life, with a significant decrease in the post-test. Conclusion The Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 proved to be a valid, reliable instrument to appraise quality of life in cancer patients. The normative data collected from this study may be useful for the early detection of initial symptoms of deterioration of quality of life in oncology patients.

Funder

projects on long survivors and quality of life

Universitat de Barcelona

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference42 articles.

1. Kaasa, S., Bjordal, K., Aaronson, N., Moum, T., Wist, E., Hagen, S., & Kvikstad, A. (1995). The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30): Validity and reliability when analysed with patients treated with palliative radiotherapy. European journal of cancer, 31(13), 2260–2263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-84049(95)00296-0

2. Gadisa, D. A., Gebremariam, E. T., & Ali, G. Y. (2019). Reliability and validity of Amharic version of EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 modules for assessing health-related quality of life among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 182. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1257-z

3. Campos, J. A. D. B., Spexoto, M. C. B., da Silva, W. R., Serrano, S. V., & Marôco, J. (2018). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30: Factorial models to Brazilian cancer patients. Einstein (São Paulo). https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082018AO4132

4. Davda, J., Kibet, H., Achieng, E., Atundo, L., & Komen, T. (2021). Assessing the acceptability, reliability, and validity of the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in Kenyan cancer patients: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 5(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-020-00275-w

5. Nolte, S., Waldmann, A., Liegl, G., Petersen, M. A., Groenvold, M., & Rose, M. (2020). Updated EORTC QLQ-C30 general population norm data for Germany. European Journal of Cancer, 137, 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3