Health-related quality of life in primary hepatic cancer: a systematic review assessing the methodological properties of instruments and a meta-analysis comparing treatment strategies
-
Published:2021-07-20
Issue:9
Volume:30
Page:2429-2466
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Wohlleber Kerstin, Heger Patrick, Probst Pascal, Engel Christoph, Diener Markus K., Mihaljevic André L.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
Patient-reported outcomes including health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are important oncological outcome measures. The validation of HRQoL instruments for patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma is lacking. Furthermore, studies comparing different treatment options in respect to HRQoL are sparse. The objective of the systematic review and meta-analysis was, therefore, to identify all available HRQoL tools regarding primary liver cancer, to assess the methodological quality of these HRQoL instruments and to compare surgical, interventional and medical treatments with regard to HRQoL.
Methods
A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane library, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE. The methodological quality of all identified HRQoL instruments was performed according to the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurements INstruments (COSMIN) standard. Consequently, the quality of reporting of HRQoL data was assessed. Finally, wherever possible HRQoL data were extracted and quantitative analyses were performed.
Results
A total of 124 studies using 29 different HRQoL instruments were identified. After the methodological assessment, only 10 instruments fulfilled the psychometric criteria and could be included in subsequent analyses. However, quality of reporting of HRQoL data was insufficient, precluding meta-analyses for 9 instruments.
Conclusion
Using a standardized methodological assessment, specific HRQoL instruments are recommended for use in patients with hepatocellular and cholangiocellular carcinoma. HRQoL data of patients undergoing treatment of primary liver cancers are sparse and reporting falls short of published standards. Meaningful comparison of established treatment options with regard to HRQoL was impossible indicating the need for future research.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference164 articles.
1. European Medicines Agency. (2016, April 1). The use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studies. Appendix 2 to the guideline on the evaluation of anticancer medicinal products in man. EMA/CHMP/292464/2014. 2. McGrail, K., Bryan, S., & Davis, J. (2011). Let’s all go to the PROM: The case for routine patient-reported outcome measurement in Canadian healthcare. HealthcarePapers, 11(4), 8–18. discussion 55–58. 3. Fitzpatrick, R., Davey, C., Buxton, M. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England), 2(14), 1–74. 4. Aber, A., Poku, E., Phillips, P., Essat, M., Buckley Woods, H., Palfreyman, S., Kaltenthaler, E., Jones, G., & Michaels, J. (2017). Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in patients with varicose veins. The British Journal of Surgery, 104(11), 1424–1432. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.10639 5. Poku, E., Aber, A., Phillips, P., Essat, M., Buckley Woods, H., Palfreyman, S., Kaltenthaler, E., Jones, G., & Michaels, J. (2017). Systematic review assessing the measurement properties of patient-reported outcomes for venous leg ulcers. BJS open, 1(5), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.25
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|