Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The objective of this study was to develop an EQ-5D-5L value set based on the health preferences of the general adult population of Vietnam.
Methods
The EQ-VT protocol version 2.1 was applied. Multi-stage stratified cluster sampling was employed to recruit a nationally representative sample. Both composite time trade-off (C-TTO) and discrete choice experiment (DCE) methods were used. Several modelling approaches were considered including hybrid; tobit; panel and heteroscedastic models. First, models using C-TTO or DCE data were tested separately. Then possibility of combining the C-TTO and DCE data was examined. Hybrid models were tested if it was sensible to combine both types of data. The best-performing model was selected based on both the consistency of the results produced and the degree to which models used all the available data.
Results
Data from 1200 respondents representing the general Vietnamese adult population were included in the analyses. Only the DCE Logit model and the regular Hybrid model that uses all available data produced consistent results. As the priority was to use all available data if possible, the hybrid model was selected to generate the Vietnamese value set. Mobility had the largest effect on health state values, followed by pain/discomfort, usual activities, anxiety/depression and self-care. The Vietnam values ranged from − 0.5115 to 1.
Conclusion
This is the first value set for EQ-5D-5L based on social preferences obtained from a nationally representative sample in Vietnam. The value set will likely play a key role in economic evaluations and health technology assessments in Vietnam.
Funder
EuroQol Research Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference48 articles.
1. Vietnam Ministry of Health, H. P. G. (2014). Report on Strengthening prevention and control of Non-communicabe diseases. Joint Annual Health Review 2014.
2. Drummond, M. F. (1987). Resource allocation decisions in health care: A role for quality of life assessments? Journal of Chronic Disease,40(6), 605–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90021-x.
3. Torrance, G. W. (1986). Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal: A review. Journal of Health Economics,5, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-6296(86)90020-2.
4. Decision 5315/QD-BYT on the principles and criteria for the formulation of list of new drugs under the national health insurance scheme. (2018). 5315/QD-BYT. Vietnam: Ministry of Health.
5. Rowen, D., Azzabi Zouraq, I., Chevrou-Severac, H., & van Hout, B. (2017). International regulations and recommendations for utility data for health technology assessment. PharmacoEconomics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0544-y.
Cited by
63 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献