The association between self-reported health status and adverse events: a comparison among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The association between self-reported health status and adverse events: a comparison among coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)

Published:2020-08-28 Issue:11 Volume:29 Page:3017-3029
ISSN:0962-9343
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
language:en
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res

Author:

Nielsen Stine Nørris^ORCID,Rasmussen Trine Bernholdt,Lassen Jens Flensted,Berg Selina Kikkenborg,Thrysoee Lars,Møller Jacob Eifer,Jensen Lisette Okkels,Thuesen Anne Langhoff,Christensen Anne Vinggaard,Ekholm Ola,Mols Rikke,Thorup Charlotte Brun,Borregaard Britt^ORCID

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11136-020-02573-8.pdf

Reference49 articles.

1. Sanchis-Gomar, F., Perez-Quilis, C., Leischik, R., et al. (2016). Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Annals of Translational Medicine, 4(13), 256. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.06.33. (publishedOnlineFirst:2016/08/09).

2. Sousa-Uva, M., Neumann, F. J., Ahlsson, A., et al. (2019). 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 55(1), 4–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy289. (publishedOnlineFirst:2018/08/31).

3. Head, S. J., Milojevic, M., Taggart, D. P., et al. (2017). Current practice of state-of-the-art surgical coronary revascularization. Circulation, 136(14), 1331–1345. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022572. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/10/04).

4. Byrne, R. A., Stone, G. W., Ormiston, J., et al. (2017). Coronary balloon angioplasty, stents, and scaffolds. Lancet, 390(10096), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31927-X. (publishedOnlineFirst:2017/08/24).

5. Mulukutla, S. R., Gleason, T. G., Sharbaugh, M., et al. (2019). Coronary bypass versus percutaneous revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease. Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 108(2), 474–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.02.064. (publishedOnlineFirst:2019/05/06).

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Associations of health-related quality of life with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events for individuals with ischaemic heart disease: systematic review, meta-analysis and evidence mapping;Open Heart;2023-10

2. Effectiveness, safety, and patient reported outcomes of a planned investment procedure in higher‐risk chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the invest‐CTO study;Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions;2023-05-17

3. Self-reported health and adverse outcomes among women living with symptoms of angina or unspecific chest pain but no diagnosis of obstructive coronary artery disease—findings from the DenHeart study;European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing;2022-09-16

4. Validation of the PROMIS-29v2 Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Participating in Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation;Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention;2022-02-08

5. Pentoxifylline for treatment of major depression after percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial;Journal of Psychosomatic Research;2021-11