Item selection, scaling and construct validation of the Patient-Reported Inventory of Self-Management of Chronic Conditions (PRISM-CC) measurement tool in adults
-
Published:2022-06-27
Issue:9
Volume:31
Page:2867-2880
-
ISSN:0962-9343
-
Container-title:Quality of Life Research
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Qual Life Res
Author:
Kephart GeorgeORCID, Packer TanyaORCID, Audulv ÅsaORCID, Chen Yu-TingORCID, Robinson AlysiaORCID, Olsson IngridORCID, Warner GraceORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
To select and scale items for the seven domains of the Patient-Reported Inventory of Self-Management of Chronic Conditions (PRISM-CC) and assess its construct validity.
Methods
Using an online survey, data on 100 potential items, and other variables for assessing construct validity, were collected from 1055 adults with one or more chronic health conditions. Based on a validated conceptual model, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and item response models (IRT) were used to select and scale potential items and assess the internal consistency and structural validity of the PRISM-CC. To further assess construct validity, hypothesis testing of known relationships was conducted using structural equation models.
Results
Of 100 potential items, 36 (4–8 per domain) were selected, providing excellent fit to our hypothesized correlated factors model and demonstrating internal consistency and structural validity of the PRISM-CC. Hypothesized associations between PRISM-CC domains and other measures and variables were confirmed, providing further evidence of construct validity.
Conclusion
The PRISM-CC overcomes limitations of assessment tools currently available to measure patient self-management of chronic health conditions. This study provides strong evidence for the internal consistency and construct validity of the PRISM-CC as an instrument to assess patient-reported difficulty in self-managing different aspects of daily life with one or more chronic conditions. Further research is needed to assess its measurement equivalence across patient attributes, ability to measure clinically important change, and utility to inform self-management support.
Funder
Canadian Institutes of Health Research Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Reference54 articles.
1. Schulman-Green, D., Jaser, S., Martin, F., Alonzo, A., Grey, M., McCorkle, R., Redeker, N. S., Reynolds, N., & Whittemore, R. (2012). Processes of self-management in chronic illness. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 44(2), 136–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2012.01444.x 2. Van de Velde, D., De Zutter, F., Satink, T., Costa, U., Janquart, S., De, S. D., & Vriendt, P. (2019). Delineating the concept of self-management in chronic conditions: A concept analysis. British Medical Journal Open, 9(7), e027775. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027775 3. Corrigan, J. M., Adams, K., & Greiner, A. C. (2004). 1st Annual Crossing the Quality Chasm Summit: A Focus on Communities. National Academies Press. 4. Simmons, L. A., Wolever, R. Q., Bechard, E. M., & Snyderman, R. (2014). Patient engagement as a risk factor in personalized health care: A systematic review of the literature on chronic disease. Genome Med, 6(2), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/gm533 5. Liddy, C., Blazkho, V., & Mill, K. (2014). Challenges of self-management when living with multiple chronic conditions: Systematic review of the qualitative literature. Canadian Family Physician, 60(12), 1123–1133.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|