A holistic sustainability assessment of organic (certified and non-certified) and non-organic smallholder farms in Kenya
-
Published:2021-09-02
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1387-585X
-
Container-title:Environment, Development and Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Dev Sustain
Author:
Kamau Juliet WanjikuORCID, Schader Christian, Biber-Freudenberger Lisa, Stellmacher Till, Amudavi David M., Landert Jan, Blockeel Johan, Whitney Cory, Borgemeister Christian
Abstract
AbstractThe introduction of organic farm management practices in sub-Saharan Africa could act as a lever for supporting regional sustainable development. In this study, we sought to assess the sustainability performance of organic (certified and non-certified) and non-organic farms in the dry Kajiado County and the wet Murang’a County in Kenya, based on four sustainability dimensions: Good Governance, Environmental Integrity, Economic Resilience and Social Well-Being. We collected household survey data from 400 smallholder farms, which were formally characterized into five types (mixed organic and conventional, certified organic, organic, conventional, and subsistence farms). We used multivariate analysis of variance, linear fixed-effects and general linear models to examine differences in sustainability performance. Model results indicate that all farms lack reliable farm management information and that only limited knowledge, skills and social security exist for farmers and farm workers. Comparison of the five farm types indicates no significant differences in their sustainability performance. Nonetheless, certified organic farms had better sustainability performance than non-certified farms due to higher economic resilience, environmental integrity, better support and training for workers. However, except for avoiding the use of agrochemicals in certified farms, there is relatively little difference in the farm management practices across farm types. Our results also indicate that farms in Murang’a were more sustainable than those in Kajiado due to better regional land-tenure security and conflict resolution mechanisms, soil and water conservation measures, and farm commercial viability. Nonetheless, unlike Kajiado, farms in Murang’a showed a tendency toward poor animal husbandry practices which affects overall animal welfare, limited credit uptake and market involvement. The results of this study can support decision making to identify appropriate interventions for improving sustainability in smallholder farms.
Funder
Biovision African Trust, funded by World Agroforestry Center and Swedish Society for Nature Conservation Center for Development Research, University of Bonn Research Institute of Organic Agriculture, Switzerland Biovision Foundation Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference104 articles.
1. Adamtey, N., Musyoka, M. W., Zundel, C., Cobo, J. G., Karanja, E., Fiaboe, K. K. M., et al. (2016). Productivity, profitability and partial nutrient balance in maize-based conventional and organic farming systems in Kenya. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 235, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.10.001 2. Adhiamb o, M. P., Kironchi, G., Mureithi, S., & Kathumo, V. (2017). Assessing land use and land cover change using participatory geographical information system (PGIS) approach in Nguruman Sub-catchment, Kajiado north Sub county, Kenya. Journal of Geography and Regional Planning, 10(8), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.5897/JGRP2016.0606 3. Aliloo, A. A., & Dashti, S. (2021). Rural sustainability assessment using a combination of multi-criteria decision making and factor analysis. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 6323–6336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00874-z 4. Altieri, M. A. (2009). Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review, 61(3), 102. 5. Angevin, F., Fortino, G., Bockstaller, C., Pelzer, E., & Messéan, A. (2017). Assessing the sustainability of crop production systems: Toward a common framework? Crop Protection, 97(Supplement C), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.11.018
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|