Abstract
AbstractIn 1980, the Federal Mining Act was introduced to govern the use of the German subsurface. By paying royalties, companies can get permission to exploit resources. Yet, there is no official report breaking down the payments for hydrocarbons and lignite, in particular regarding the effectively levied fees. Hence, the objective of this study is to provide an overview of the ownership and paid royalties, and to discuss the sustainable use and management of the German subsurface in the face of ecological, social, and economic impacts of resource exploitation. Our analysis shows that the subsurface is partly state- and partly company-owned. Lignite is almost exclusively privately owned by two companies. In contrast, hydrocarbons are predominantly state-owned. In 2017, on average 13% was paid in royalties for gas and 11% for petroleum. These royalties have minor impact on state budgets. For instance, in the concerned state of Lower Saxony, the levies amount to 189 million € or 0.6% of the state budget. Thus, the state income from royalties is low. However, local communities and property owners have no financial benefits. Finally, to obtain a more sustainable use of subsurface, the current Federal Mining Act must be adapted to account for environmental and social impacts.
Funder
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference70 articles.
1. Balcombe, P., Anderson, K., Speirs, J., Brandon, N., & Hawkes, A. (2017). The natural gas supply Chain: The importance of methane and carbon dioxide emissions. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 5(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00144.
2. Beckmann, M. (2015). Umweltschutz und Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung im Bergrecht. Natur und Recht, 37, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10357-015-2788-7.
3. Berger, T. (2016). Was sich in der Lausitz ändert. Sächsische Zeitung, page 19. 05.07.2016.
4. Betzholz, D. & George, C. (2016). Ein Dorf, der Krebs und die Wut. Die Welt, page 8. 20.04.16.
5. BGR. (2016). Schieferöl und Schiefergas in Deutschland–Potenziale und Umweltaspekte. Technical report, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover. [29-04-2020].
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献