Who owns the German subsurface? Ownership and sustainable governance of the subsurface in Germany

Author:

Berger Frederic,Blum PhilippORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn 1980, the Federal Mining Act was introduced to govern the use of the German subsurface. By paying royalties, companies can get permission to exploit resources. Yet, there is no official report breaking down the payments for hydrocarbons and lignite, in particular regarding the effectively levied fees. Hence, the objective of this study is to provide an overview of the ownership and paid royalties, and to discuss the sustainable use and management of the German subsurface in the face of ecological, social, and economic impacts of resource exploitation. Our analysis shows that the subsurface is partly state- and partly company-owned. Lignite is almost exclusively privately owned by two companies. In contrast, hydrocarbons are predominantly state-owned. In 2017, on average 13% was paid in royalties for gas and 11% for petroleum. These royalties have minor impact on state budgets. For instance, in the concerned state of Lower Saxony, the levies amount to 189 million € or 0.6% of the state budget. Thus, the state income from royalties is low. However, local communities and property owners have no financial benefits. Finally, to obtain a more sustainable use of subsurface, the current Federal Mining Act must be adapted to account for environmental and social impacts.

Funder

Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference70 articles.

1. Balcombe, P., Anderson, K., Speirs, J., Brandon, N., & Hawkes, A. (2017). The natural gas supply Chain: The importance of methane and carbon dioxide emissions. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 5(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00144.

2. Beckmann, M. (2015). Umweltschutz und Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung im Bergrecht. Natur und Recht, 37, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10357-015-2788-7.

3. Berger, T. (2016). Was sich in der Lausitz ändert. Sächsische Zeitung, page 19. 05.07.2016.

4. Betzholz, D. & George, C. (2016). Ein Dorf, der Krebs und die Wut. Die Welt, page 8. 20.04.16.

5. BGR. (2016). Schieferöl und Schiefergas in Deutschland–Potenziale und Umweltaspekte. Technical report, Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover. [29-04-2020].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3