An indicator-based sustainability assessment method for indigenous communities: a case study from Mexico

Author:

Molina Maturano JessicaORCID,García Serrano Luz A.ORCID,Carmona García Juan A.ORCID,García de Alva Magos Mayela A.ORCID,Hersperger Anna M.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractIndigenous and Western communities are faced with increasing issues of sustainability compromising their natural resources and cultural heritage, for example, a cross-pollination/complementary approach in relation to their current knowledge systems and discourses on sustainability. There is a need for methods that integrate different discourses relating to sustainability to identify the most pressing needs in terms of sustainability. Sustainability assessments are a type of impact assessment that focus on enhanced sustainability both now and in the future; however, the literature on indigenous sustainability assessment methods, is scarce. To address this gap, we have developed a novel Sustainability Assessment method for Indigenous Communities (SAIC). The SAIC method combines Western and indigenous sustainability objectives and principles, in order to extend the range of options for action to address sustainability. The SAIC method consists of two sections (i) values and considerations and (ii) procedure. The “values and considerations” section establishes the fundamental participatory and ethical considerations for conducting sustainability assessments in indigenous communities, and the “procedure” section establishes a set of 55 indicators in eight categories. The method was tested in a Zapotec, indigenous community in México. Results show that this community was rated highly in all eight categories. However, indicators for family planning and access to health services were rated poorly. The identified issues can be used as guidelines for decision making in future regional projects and development plans. The results reveal further areas for improvement, such as strengthening the links to national or international networks and increasing the use of renewable energies. The method presented in this paper provides an assessment approach based on Western and indigenous sustainability discourses, which is suitable for assessing indigenous communities.

Funder

WSL - Eidgenössische Forschungsanstalt für Wald, Schnee und Landschaft

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development

Reference61 articles.

1. Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and Change, 26, 413–439.

2. Ander-Egg, E. (2003). Repensando la Investigación-Acción Participativa. Lumen-Humanitas.

3. Arias Gutierrez, R. I., Gonzalez Sousa, R., Herrera Sorzano, A., & Aleman Perez, R. D. (2015). Comprehensive assessment of Kichwa Ecuadorian Amazon communities for the elaboration of the strategy for sustainable development. II. Socioeconomic Indicators. Centro Agricola, 42(3), 75–81.

4. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies (AIATSIS). (2011). Guidelines for ethical research in Australian Indigenous studies. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. https://aiatsis.gov.au/research/ethical-research.

5. Best, A., Conlin, R., Palmer, K., Crofut, S., Hatcher, L., Roberts, J., Tuttle, C., Walter, S. (2003). Indicators of Sustainable Community. Sustainable Seattle. https://ise.unige.ch/isdd/IMG/pdf/Indicateurs.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3