Abstract
AbstractTo guarantee a dignified life in low-incoming countries where socio-environmental negative implications derived from the municipal solid waste (MSW) by its excessive generation, lack of governance, and financial resources, sustainable and integrated solutions are required. From this perspective, well-located transfer stations (TSs) are conceived as an alternative to improve MSW management quality in municipalities that generate little MSW and have long transportation distances. Consequently, this research aims to find optimum areas to locate TSs in the province of Azuay-Ecuador as a commonwealth proposal. It applies a multi-criteria decision analysis based on geographic information systems with the analytical hierarchical process technique: a heuristic and scalable method that simultaneously evaluates subjective and non-monetized inputs. The authors faced it from a holistic perspective in a three-level hierarchical structure; starting from categories: technical, environmental, economic, and social; then criteria: rivers, protected areas, populated areas, land use, educational centers, health centers, tourist sites, basic services, roads, gravity centers, geology, power grid, and slopes; and finally, sub-criteria defined by criteria´s measurable attributes. This research provides local decision-makers with middle-scale tools and a first diagnosis to focus later efforts in local studios over potential sites. The results showed that 79.12% of the study area was restrictive to place a TS. The remaining territory suitability index values between 13 and 89% were found, with possible TSs at Paute, Sigsig, and Nabón to serve nine from fifteen cantons.
Funder
Universidad Católica de Cuenca
Empresa Municipal de Aseo de Cuenca
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference174 articles.
1. Abdilah, F. (2020). Evaluation of potential anaerobic digestion facilities in Selangor, Malaysia by integrating GIS and Multi-criteria Decision Aid (MCDA). GeoSciences MSc Thesis Collection. https: //hdl.handle.net/1842/37643
2. Achillas, C., Moussiopoulos, N., Karagiannidis, A., Banias, G., & Perkoulidis, G. (2013). The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: A literature review. Waste Management and Research, 31, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X12470203
3. Ağaçsapan, B., & Çabuk, S. N. (2020). Determination of suitable waste transfer station areas for sustainable territories: Eskisehir case. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101829
4. Ajjur, S. B., & Mogheir, Y. K. (2020). Flood hazard mapping using a multi-criteria decision analysis and GIS (case study Gaza Governorate, Palestine). Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 13, 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-5024-6
5. Alemdar, K. D., Kaya, Ö., & Çodur, M. Y. (2020). A GIS and microsimulation-based MCDA approach for evaluation of pedestrian crossings. Accident Analysis and Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2020.105771
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献