Abstract
AbstractBrazil is the largest generator of electrical and electronic waste (e-waste) in Latin America but faces significant challenges with its management. This study investigates barriers to the growth of the formal sector in transitioning toward an established e-waste management system in the country. Driven by sustainability transitions research, it applies a transition management approach to e-waste management. The study presents the results of field studies conducted in four organizations with different levels of recycling operations. The results show several barriers, for instance, a lack of processes for the complete separation of metals, high reverse logistics cost, a lack of transparency throughout the supply chains, concern with data security, and a lack of financial incentives and policy integration. The study highlights various initiatives from the organizations that assist in tackling some of the identified barriers and shed light on possible transition pathways. The study provides a perspective from e-waste management organizations and policy insights to strengthen e-waste management in the country.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference62 articles.
1. Abbondanza, M. N. M., & Souza, R. G. (2019). Estimating the generation of household e-waste in municipalities using primary data from surveys: A case study of Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil. Waste Management, 85, 374–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2018.12.040.
2. Abinee (2024). Associação Brasileira da Indústria Elétrica e Eletrônica. http://www.abinee.org.br/. Accessed 23 March 2024.
3. Abree (2024). Associação Brasileira de Reciclagem de Eletroeletrônicos e Eletrodomésticos. http://abree.org.br/. Accessed 23 March 2024.
4. Althaf, S., Babbitt, C. W., & Chen, R. (2021). The evolution of consumer electronic waste in the United States. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 25(3), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13074.
5. Awasthi, A. K., & Li, J. (2017). Management of electrical and electronic waste: A comparative evaluation of China and India. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 434–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.067.