Abstract
AbstractClimate change simulations allow the experience of complex processes in rapid progression. Additionally, they hold the potential to enable citizens to quickly evaluate the impact of measures offered as political options to mitigate climate change. Taking En-roads as a test case, we investigated whether exposure to a web-based climate simulation influences laypersons’ views on effectiveness of such measures with an experiment in Germany (N = 271). High usability ratings ascertained that the simulation can be used by lay-persons without detailed support. In line with this, app usage was effective. Using the climate simulation led to higher self-efficacy with regard to being able to evaluate policies with the help of tools. Moreover, comparisons with the control group suggested that app usage affects beliefs about the impact of specific measures such as CO2 pricing. Taken together, the results suggest that online climate simulations such as En-roads can help inform and empower citizens in the process of mitigation of and adaptation to climate change.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Avagyan, A. B. (2021). Theory of bioenergy accumulation and transformation: Application to evolution, energy, sustainable development, climate change, manufacturing, agriculture, military activity and pandemic challenges. Athens Journal of Science, 8(1), 57–80. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajs.8-1-4
2. Beierlein, C., Kemper, C. J., Kovaleva, A., & Rammstedt, B. (2012). Ein Messinstrument zur Erfassung politischer Kompetenz- und Einflussüberzeugungen – Political Efficacy Kurzskala (PEKS) [A measurement tool for assessing political competence and efficacy beliefs – Political Efficacy Short Scale (PEKS)]. GESIS Working Papers 2012|18. Köln: GESIS.
3. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS – a quick and dirty usability scale. In P. W. Jorden, B. Thomas, B. A. Weerdmeester, & I. L. McClelland (Eds.), Usabiliy evaluation industry (pp. 189–194). Taylor and Francis.
4. Brosch, T. (2021). Affect and emotions as drivers of climate change perception and action: A review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Science, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.001
5. Carter, N., & Pearson, M. (2020). A ‘climate election’? The environment and the Greens in the 2019 UK general election. Environmental Politics, 29(4), 746–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1757187