Abstract
AbstractNatural events continue to take a heavy toll on human lives. Added to this are the challenge of dynamic at-risk settings, uncertainty, and increasing threats, which demand holistic, flexible, and quickly adaptable solutions. In this context, mobile applications are strongly emerging as communication tools that can assist in disaster reduction. Yet, these have not been sufficiently evaluated. In view of this, the aim of this research is to evaluate the adequacy of mobile applications in disaster risk reduction in reference to some of the deadliest natural events. To this purpose, a two-part methodology is developed. Firstly, a random sample of applications is evaluated and contrasted with the literature. Secondly, the viability of mobile applications is determined based on the Digital Application Potential Index proposed by the authors, cross-referenced in Geographical Information Systems with the WorldRiskIndex. The results show that most mobile applications limit their coverage range to only one stage of Disaster Risk Management (DRM) and one type of hazard event, failing to address systemic risk and hampering the scale-up of humanitarian response. For these to become adequate and wide-reaching, strong policies to promote reliability, transparency, and citizen empowerment would be required. The policies establishing the use of mobile applications as a viable tool for DRM must consider reducing the prices of internet connectivity while increasing educational levels, on top of language translation. At this point, the adoption of mobile applications is unable to ensure DRM communication, especially in countries with higher-risk levels, requiring these to be complemented with auxiliary tools.
Graphic abstract
Funder
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference83 articles.
1. Abarca-Alvarez, F. J., Reinoso-Bellido, R., & Campos-Sánchez, F. S. (2019). Decision model for predicting social vulnerability using artificial intelligence. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(12), 575.
2. ANSS - Advanced National Seismic System. (2020). Retrieved 16 July 2020, from https://www.usgs.gov/natural-hazards/earthquake-hazards/anss-advanced-national-seismic-system?qt-science_support_page_related_con=4#qt-science_support_page_related_con
3. Arce, M. F., Córdoba, A. C., & UNESCO. (2012). Las TIC y la gestión del riesgo a desastres. Hacia La Sociedad de La Información y El Conocimiento.
4. Arshad, B., Ogie, R., Barthelemy, J., Pradhan, B., Verstaevel, N., & Perez, P. (2019). Computer vision and IoT-based sensors in flood monitoring and mapping: A systematic review. Sensors, 19(22), 5012. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19225012
5. Association, G. S. M. (2020). The mobile economy–2020. GSMA Intelligence, 30.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献