Abstract
AbstractThis paper analysed the effect of freshwater withdrawals and management on agricultural and industrial sectors productivity in the emerging market economies. The auto-regressive distributed lag model and the panel analyses were employed in our estimations. Our result revealed that Brazil had better water use efficiency in agricultural production with annual withdrawals which contribute significantly and positively to the increase in crop and livestock index. In contrast, annual withdrawals for agriculture were considered to be least efficient in Russia, followed by China and India, although, in South Africa, the result suggested an insignificant positive effect in the incremental index. Furthermore, our analysis revealed that freshwater withdrawals have a significant positive impact on industrial outputs in South Africa. Similarly, water withdrawals were positively related to industrial sector productivity in China and Russia. Brazil and India appear to be the least efficient countries where withdrawals impacted negatively (and significantly for Brazil) on industrial sector outputs. Our panel analyses showed that freshwater withdrawals were positively associated with crop and livestock production index and industrial outputs in the BRICS economies. However, the magnitude of the impacts was only significant for the industrial sector. Moreover, investments and private participation in water and sanitation projects impacted significantly and positively in productivity in both sectors.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference55 articles.
1. Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012), World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050. ESA Working Paper No. 12-03. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/3/ap106e/ap106e.pdf
2. Atay, M. U. (2015). The impact of climate change on agricultural production in Mediterranean countries. PhD thesis, Middle East Technical University (pp. 1–99).
3. Benson, A., & Huffaker, R. (2012). The impact of agricultural water conservation policy on economic growth. The Open Hydrology Journal, 6, 112–117.
4. Berni, A., Giuliani, A., Tartaglia, F., Tromba, L., Sgueglia, M., Blasi, S., & Russo, G. (2011). Effect of vascular risk factors on the increase in carotid and femoral intima-media thickness. Identification of a Risk Scale. Atherosclerosis, 216(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.01.034
5. Boberg, J. (2005). How demographic changes and water management policies affect freshwater resources. The RAND Corporation, (2005/010743) (pp. 1–154).