How to shape communication for CO2-derived insulation boards considering different accepter profiles
-
Published:2023-09-16
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1387-585X
-
Container-title:Environment, Development and Sustainability
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Environ Dev Sustain
Author:
Simons LisanneORCID, Ziefle MartinaORCID, Arning KatrinORCID
Abstract
AbstractClimate change is a constant global challenge. An approach to help mitigate climate change is carbon capture and utilization (CCU), in which captured CO2 is reused as raw material for consumer products. Because innovations like CCU are unfamiliar to the general public, their communication is critical for a successful rollout. To date, sustainability innovation research has largely neglected the empirical study of communication. The present study contributes to studying the information and communication needs of laypeople based on perceptions and acceptance patterns for CCU by focusing on acceptance profiles for CCU-based insulation boards. In an empirical two-step approach, a qualitative interview prestudy was followed by a quantitative questionnaire measurement (N = 643). Using k-means clustering, the respondents were divided into three acceptance groups: rejecters (15%), tentative accepters (51%), and strong accepters (34%). Analysis showed that regarding their demographics and personality traits, tentative accepters and rejecters were similar. All segments trusted science and health experts best, and only the rejecters distrusted some specific actors. Information on the product’s risks and functional properties was most important for all acceptance groups. Based on the study’s insights, both general and targeted managerial communication and policy guidelines were formulated.
Funder
Horizon 2020 RWTH Aachen University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Economics and Econometrics,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference68 articles.
1. Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research., 1, 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6 2. Allen, M. R., Babiker, M., Chen, Y., Coninck, H. D., Connors, S., Diemen, R. V., Dube, O. P., Ebi, K. L., Engelbrecht, F., Ferrat, M., Ford, J., Forster, P., Fuss, S., Guillén, B. T., Harold, J., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Hourcade, J-C., Huppmann, D., Jacob, D., Zickfeld, K. (2018). Summary for Policymakers. IPCC 2018. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/ 3. Arning, K., Offermann-van Heek, J., Linzenich, A., Kaetelhoen, A., Sternberg, A., Bardow, A., & Ziefle, M. (2019). Same or different? Insights on public perception and acceptance of carbon capture and storage or utilization in Germany. Energy Policy, 125, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.039 4. Arning, K., Offermann-van Heek, J., & Ziefle, M. (2021). What drives public acceptance of sustainable CO2-derived building materials? A conjoint-analysis of eco-benefits vs. health concerns. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 144, 110873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110873 5. Arning, K., van Heek, J., & Ziefle, M. (2018). Acceptance profiles for a carbon-derived foam mattress. Exploring and segmenting consumer perceptions of a carbon capture and utilization product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.256
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|