Abstract
AbstractIn recent years, direct seeding as a means of stand establishment has experienced a revival. Among other things it allows for an undisturbed root development and is assumed to be cost-efficient. While success factors have been worked out through numerous experiments, sound overviews of success and failure in practice are scarce. With the goals of (i) quantifying the success proportion and (ii) extracting the associated influencing factors, we conducted an inventory of direct seedings of Douglas fir in Northern Germany and fitted a hurdle negative binomial regression model to the data. The results reveal a high variability of plant density within, as well as between stands. We could attribute these differences, and thus the success, to stocking degree of the shelter, seed amount and age. The model shows both, a high precision and accuracy, and respects previous physical and biological knowledge of the data-generating mechanisms.
Funder
Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference74 articles.
1. Bartsch N, von Lüpke B, Röhrig E (2020) Waldbau auf kologischer Grundlage, UTB, vol 8310, 8th edn. Ulmer, Stuttgart
2. Bhaktha N (2018) Properties of hurdle negative binomial models for zero-inflated and overdispersed count data. Electronic dissertation. Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/
3. Bindewald A, Michiels HG, Bauhus J (2019) Risk is in the eye of the assessor comparing risk assessments of four non-native tree species in Germany. Forestry Int J Forest Res 93(4):519–534. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpz052
4. Böckmann T, Hansen J, Hauskeller-Bullerjahn K, Jensen T, Nagel J, Nagel RV, Overbeck M, Pampe A, Petereit-Bitter A, Schmidt M, Schröder M, Schulz C, Spellmann H, Stüber V, Sutmöller J, Wollborn P (2019) Klimaangepasste Baumartenwahl in den Niedersächsischen Landesforsten, Aus dem Walde–Schriftenreihe Waldentwicklung in Niedersachsen, vol 61
5. Bolte A, Ammer C, Löf M, Madsen P, Nabuurs GJ, Schall P, Spathelf P, Rock J (2009) Adaptive forest management in central Europe: climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scandinavian J Forest Res 24(6):473–482, Pii 917227340. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580903418224