Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Outcomes and Costs
Author:
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Engineering
Link
http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13669-014-0096-5.pdf
Reference26 articles.
1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:1–30.
2. Freeman RM, Pantazis, Thomson A, et al. A randomized controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:377–84. This RCT compared LSCP to open SCP. Results showed LSCP to be equivalent in anatomic and subjective outcomes at 1 year, with the laparoscopic approach also having reduced blood loss and shorted hospital stay.
3. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805–23.
4. Nygaard IE, Brubaker L, Zyczynski HM, et al. Long-term outcomes following abdominal sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. JAMA. 2013;309:2016–24.
5. Wright JD, Ananth C, Lewin SN, et al. Robotically assisted versus laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA. 2013;309:689–98. This population-based analysis of benign hysterectomies performed from 2007 to 2010 highlights an increase in minimally invasive surgical approaches to hysterectomy, with a concomitant decline in open and transvaginal hysterectomy rates.
1.学者识别学者识别
2.学术分析学术分析
3.人才评估人才评估
"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线，采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统，可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容，当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种，收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇，并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询！咨询电话：010-8811{复制后删除}0370
www.globalauthorid.com
TOP
Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司 京公网安备11010802033243号 京ICP备18003416号-3