Reply to the comment on ‘Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision’ by Bogaart et al.-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Reply to the comment on ‘Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision’ by Bogaart et al.

Published:2017-04-29 Issue:3 Volume:158 Page:891-893
ISSN:2193-7192
Container-title:Journal of Ornithology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Ornithol

Author:

Onkelinx Thierry^ORCID,Devos Koen,Jansen Ivy,Van Calster Hans,Quataert Paul

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Link

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10336-017-1457-4/fulltext.html

Reference7 articles.

1. Bell MC (1995) UINDEX4. a computer program for estimating population index numbers by the Underhill method. The Wildfowl & Wetland Trust, Slimbridge

2. Bogaart P, van der Meij T, Pannekoek J, Soldaat L, Van Strien AJ, Underhill LG (2017) Comment on ‘Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision’ by Onkelinx et al. (2016). J Ornithol. doi: 10.1007/s10336-017-1456-5

3. Onkelinx T, Devos K, Quataert P (2017a) Multimput: using multiple imputation to address missing data. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.266429 . Accessed 15 Feb 2017

4. Onkelinx T, Devos K, Quataert P (2017b) Working with population totals in the presence of missing data comparing imputation methods in terms of bias and precision. J Ornithol. doi: 10.1007/s10336-016-1404-9

5. Pannekoek J, Van Strien A (2005). TRIM 3 Manual (TRends & Indices for Monitoring data). Voorburg

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Handling missing data in ecological studies: Ignoring gaps in the dataset can distort the inference;Ecological Modelling;2022-06

2. Imputation of incomplete large‐scale monitoring count data via penalized estimation;Methods in Ecology and Evolution;2021-04-06