Abstract
AbstractGNSS integrity monitoring requires proper bounding to characterize all ranging error sources. Unlike classical approaches based on probabilistic assumptions, our alternative integrity approach depends on deterministic interval bounds as inputs. The intrinsically linear uncertainty propagation with intervals is adequate to describe remaining systematic uncertainty, the so-called imprecision. In this contribution, we make a proposal on how to derive the required intervals in order to quantify and bound the residual error for empirical troposphere models, based on the refined sensitivity analysis via interval arithmetic. We evaluated experimentally the Saastamoinen model with (i) a priori ISO standard atmosphere, and (ii) on-site meteorological measurements from IGS and Deutscher Wetterdienst (DWD) stations as inputs. We obtain consistent and complete enclosure of residual ZPD errors w.r.t IGS ZPD products. Thanks to the DWD dense network, interval maps for meteorological parameters and residual ZPD errors are generated for Germany as by-products. These experimental results and products are finally validated, taking advantage of the high-quality tropospheric delays estimated by the Vienna Ray Tracer. Overall, the results indicate that our strategy based on interval analysis successfully bounds tropospheric model uncertainty. This will contribute to a realistic uncertainty assessment of GNSS-based single point positioning.
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Reference23 articles.
1. Askne J, Nordius H (1987) Estimation of tropospheric delay for microwaves from surface weather data. Radio Science 22(03):379–386. https://doi.org/10.1029/RS022i003p00379
2. Böhm J, Möller G, Schindelegger M, Pain G, Weber R (2015) Development of an improved empirical model for slant delays in the troposphere (GPT2w). GPS Solutions 19(3):433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-014-0403-7
3. Davis JL, Herring TA, Shapiro II, Rogers AEE, Elgered G (1985) Geodesy by radio interferometry: Effects of atmospheric modeling errors on estimates of baseline length. Radio Science 20(6):1593–1607. https://doi.org/10.1029/RS020i006p01593
4. Dbouk H, Schön S (2019) Reliability and integrity measures of GPS positioning via geometrical constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2019 international technical meeting of the institute of navigation, pp 730–743. https://doi.org/10.33012/2019.16722
5. DeCleene B (2000) Defining pseudorange integrity-overbounding. In: Proceedings of the 13th international technical meeting of the satellite division of the institute of navigation (ION GPS 2000), pp 1916–1924
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Towards a set-based detector for GNSS integrity monitoring;2023 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS);2023-04-24