Time to Say ‘Good Buy’ to the Passive Consumer? A Conceptual Review of the Consumer in the Bioeconomy
-
Published:2021-06-28
Issue:4
Volume:34
Page:
-
ISSN:1187-7863
-
Container-title:Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:J Agric Environ Ethics
Author:
Wilke UlrichORCID, Schlaile Michael P.ORCID, Urmetzer SophieORCID, Mueller MatthiasORCID, Bogner KristinaORCID, Pyka AndreasORCID
Abstract
AbstractSuccessful transitions to a sustainable bioeconomy require novel technologies, processes, and practices as well as a general agreement about the overarching normative direction of innovation. Both requirements necessarily involve collective action by those individuals who purchase, use, and co-produce novelties: the consumers. Based on theoretical considerations borrowed from evolutionary innovation economics and consumer social responsibility, we explore to what extent consumers’ scope of action is addressed in the scientific bioeconomy literature. We do so by systematically reviewing bioeconomy-related publications according to (i) the extent to which consumers are regarded as passive vs. active, and (ii) different domains of consumer responsibility (depending on their power to influence economic processes). We find all aspects of active consumption considered to varying degrees but observe little interconnection between domains. In sum, our paper contributes to the bioeconomy literature by developing a novel coding scheme that allows us to pinpoint different aspects of consumer activity, which have been considered in a rather isolated and undifferentiated manner. Combined with our theoretical considerations, the results of our review reveal a central research gap which should be taken up in future empirical and conceptual bioeconomy research. The system-spanning nature of a sustainable bioeconomy demands an equally holistic exploration of the consumers’ prospective and shared responsibility for contributing to its coming of age, ranging from the procurement of information on bio-based products and services to their disposal.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung Universität Hohenheim
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),History,Environmental Chemistry
Reference210 articles.
1. Andersen, E. S. (2007). Innovation and demand. In H. Hanusch & A. Pyka (Eds.), Elgar companion to neo-Schumpeterian economics (pp. 754–765). Edward Elgar. 2. *Andronie, M., Gardan, D. A., Gardan, I. P., Andronie, I. E., & Uta, C. (2019). Integrating the principles of green marketing by using big data: Good practices. Amfiteatru Economic, 21(50), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.24818/EA/2019/50/258 3. *Aquilani, B., Silvestri, C., Ioppolo, G., & Ruggieri, A. (2018). The challenging transition to bio-economies: Towards a new framework integrating corporate sustainability and value co-creation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4001–4009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.153 4. *Awasthi, M. K., Sarsaiya, S., Wainaina, S., Rajendran, K., Kumar, S., Quan, W., et al. (2019). A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 111, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.05.017 5. *Barčić, A. P., Kuzman, M. K., Haviarova, E., & Oblak, L. (2019). Circular economy and sharing collaborative economy principles: A case study conducted in wood-based sector. 12th International Scientific Conference WoodEMA—Digitalisation and circular economy: Forestry and forestry based inductry implications, 23–28.
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|