Abstract
Abstract‘Business Process Standardization’ (BPS) is a practice intended to achieve consistency across underlying organizational processes, in support of service-delivery excellence and optimization of costs and benefits. Given the growing importance of BPS, there is need in both research and practice for clearer conceptual understanding of the notion. Following a systematic literature review approach, prior work on Business Process Standardization is synthesized and extended using tool-supported qualitative data analysis techniques, to derive an evidence-based, holistic conceptualization of BPS. We distil seven stages of BPS execution, propose a refined definition for BPS, and identify measures that gauge the several conceptual themes of BPS. The findings provide solid theoretical foundations, and practicable guidelines for future BPS researchers and practitioners.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference96 articles.
1. Abeygunasekera, A.W.J.C., W. Bandara, M. Wynn, and O. Yigitbasioglu. 2018. Nexus between business process management (BPM) and accounting: A literature review and future research directions. Business Process Management Journal 24(3):745–770. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-12-2016-0235.
2. Afflerbach, P., M. Bolsinger, and M. Röglinger. 2016. An economic decision model for determining the appropriate level of business process standardization. Business Research 9(2):335–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-016-0035-6.
3. Alvesson, M., and J. Sandberg. 2013. Problematization as a methodology for generating research questions. In Constructing research questions: doing interesting research, 47–70. London: SAGE.
4. AXELOS. 2020. ITIL® foundation certification. https://www.axelos.com/certifications/itil-certifications/itil-foundation. Accessed 3 May 2020.
5. Bandara, W., E. Furtmueller, S. Miskon, and J. Beekhuyzen. 2015. Achieving rigor in literature reviews: insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 34(8):154–204.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献