Abstract
AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of national culture on organizational resilience, the effects of which are analyzed for companies from the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) region. This paper utilizes an etic approach to study this relationship and has an empirical design with a sample of N = 464. The direct effect of national culture on organizational resilience is investigated. To measure national culture, this paper relies on the dimensions of Hofstede. A multiple regression analysis is applied to answer the hypotheses. Results show that the dimensions of power distance, individualism, uncertainty avoidance, and indulgence have a significant direct effect on an organization’s resilience. This paper confirms the necessity for reflecting upon the importance of national cultures to globally-working organizations. Organizations that are dedicated to proactive development in their organizational resilience must understand the cultural circumstances that might hinder resilience development. Indeed, cultural influences play a significant role in human resource trainings, choices of location, leadership styles, and managing stakeholders and external alliances to improve organizational resilience. This paper is the first to quantitatively study the relationship of national culture on organizational resilience.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Business, Management and Accounting
Reference182 articles.
1. Acar, William, and Frank L. Winfrey. 1994. The resilient organization: sustaining organizational renewal and performance. Journal of Strategic Change 3:165–173.
2. Alas, Ruth, Nancy Papalexandris, Eleanna Galanaki, and Katrin Niglas. 2011. Managerial values and employee commitment in a cultural context. Transformations in Business & Economics 10:42–59.
3. Alesina, Alberto, Arnaud Devleeschauwer, William Easterly, Sergio Kurlat, and Romain Wacziarg. 2003. Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth 8(2):155–194.
4. Alesina, Alberto, Stelios Michalopoulos, and Elias Papaioannou. 2016. Ethnic Inequality. Journal of Political Economy 124(2):428–488.
5. Allison, Paul D. 2001. Missing data—quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献