Modeling the structural relationships among Chinese secondary school students’ computational thinking efficacy in learning AI, AI literacy, and approaches to learning AI-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Modeling the structural relationships among Chinese secondary school students’ computational thinking efficacy in learning AI, AI literacy, and approaches to learning AI

Published:2023-07-31 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:1360-2357
Container-title:Education and Information Technologies
language:en
Short-container-title:Educ Inf Technol

Author:

Lin Xiao-Fan^ORCID,Zhou Yue,Shen Weipeng,Luo Guoyu,Xian Xiaoqing,Pang Bo

Funder

The National Natural Science Foundation of China

The National Key R&D Program of China

The Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou

The Special Funds of Climbing Program regarding the Cultivation of Guangdong College Students’ Scientific and Technological Innovation

Guangzhou Youth’ Participation in Rural Revitalization Research: The I-SEED ‘Internet Plus’ Cloud Public Welfare to Empower Rural Education Revitalization

Teaching Quality Project of South China Normal University: Professional Development of Artificial Intelligence Teachers under “New Normal” Background

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Education

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10639-023-12029-4.pdf

Reference66 articles.

1. Akben-Selcuk, E., & Altiok-Yilmaz, A. (2014). Financial literacy among turkish college students: The role of formal education, learning approaches, and parental teaching. Psychological Reports, 115(2), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.2466/31.11.pr0.115c18z3.

2. Allen, B., McGough, A. S., & Devlin, M. (2022). Toward a framework for teaching artificial intelligence to a higher education audience. Acm Transactions on Computing Education, 22(2), https://doi.org/10.1145/3485062.

3. Angeli, C., & Giannakos, M. (2020). Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges. Computers in Human Behavior, 105, 106185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.106185.

4. Ballard, E. D., & Haroldson, R. (2021). Analysis of computational thinking in children’s literature for K-6 students: Literature as a non-programming unplugged resource. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1487–1516. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211004048.

5. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Delving into primary students’ conceptions of artificial intelligence learning: A drawing-based epistemic network analysis;Education and Information Technologies;2024-06-27

2. Using the Theoretical-Experiential Binomial for Educating AI-Literate Students;Sustainability;2024-05-13

3. Exploring Factors That Support Pre-service Teachers’ Engagement in Learning Artificial Intelligence;Journal for STEM Education Research;2024-04-12