Abstract
AbstractIn the 1970s, research on artificial intelligence in education emerged with the aim of acknowledging and accommodating the psychological aspects of the learning process. Since then, its applications have evolved and it is now used for student learning and assessment, teachers’ pedagogical practice, management of educational institutions, and lifelong learning. Nevertheless, the ethical challenges of educational programmes using these systems have not been thoroughly studied. Anchored on the theoretical frame of dialogic ethics, this paper presents a section of a participatory futures research project. The goal of the research is to develop a toolkit that educators can use to ensure a smooth and ethical transition to artificial intelligence-based education while preserving the interests of educational development. This paper emphasises the need for an informed and participatory process that involves all stakeholders and begins with an expert consultation through the Delphi method, the results of which allowed the construction of eight hypothetical futures scenarios. These scenarios provide evidence that examining the ethics of using artificial intelligence systems presents an opportunity to reflect on the ethics of education as a whole. They highlight the challenge of balancing the benefits and drawbacks of such systems, especially concerning educational goals and the interplay between diverse educational actors and personal development in educational settings. The study outcomes are intended to encourage discussions on the integration of ethical artificial intelligence in education and facilitate the continuing professional development of teachers by equipping them with scenarios that can be used as a resource for training purposes.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Education
Reference65 articles.
1. Almenara, J. C., & Osuna, J. B. (2013). La utilización del juicio de experto para la evaluación de TIC: el coeficiente de competencia experta. Bordón, 65(2), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.13042/brp.2013.65202.
2. Andreotti, V., Stein, S., Ahenakew, C., & Hunt, D. (2015). Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education. Decolonization: Indigeneity Education & Society, 4(1), 21–40.
3. Arteaga-Martínez, B., Macías-Sánchez, J., Pla-Castells, M., & Ramírez-García, M. (2021). Design and validation of an observation instrument for mathematics classes in secondary education: Expert panel and Delphi process. RELIEVE, 27(2), art3. https://doi.org/10.30827/relieve.v27i2.21812.
4. Bahadorestani, A., Naderpajouh, N., & Sadiq, R. (2020). Planning for sustainable stakeholder engagement based on the assessment of conflicting interests in projects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242(46), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118402.
5. Bond, M., Marín, V. I., & Bedenlier, S. (2021). International collaboration in the field of Educational Research: A Delphi Study. Journal of new Approaches in Education Research, 10(2), 190–213. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2021.7.614.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献