Abstract
AbstractSmart classroom setting is an effective technology-enhanced pedagogy when an instructor capitalises on the key drivers underlying its success. The objectives of the study are twofold. First, to investigate the factors that impact learners’ academic performance in the smart classroom setting. Second, to determine whether learners’ performance varies based on their gender and prior experience in the smart classroom. Three schools were selected and sampled from a pool of public advanced level (A’ Level) STEM secondary schools with smart classrooms in Rwanda because they were among the first to set up smart classrooms. Data were randomly obtained from 389 learners, majoring in six different combinations. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to assess the validity and reliability of the measurement scale. A valid and thought-provoking learners’ academic performance model, to enhance their learning outcomes, is presented. The model was validated using Structural equation modelling (SEM). The results indicated that technology self-efficacy, perceived ease of use, and learning satisfaction were all predictors of learners’ performance. Learners’ perceived ease of use and satisfaction were direct predictors of their performance. Besides, learners’ perceived ease of use and usefulness were directly affected by technology self-efficacy. On the other hand, technology self-efficacy indirectly impacts learners’ performance. The invariance analysis across gender groups revealed that male learners perceive smart classroom technology to be easier to use than females. Meanwhile, no evidence of metric invariance estimation of experience was found. We argue that effective pedagogical approaches can mitigate gender disparities in perceived usability of smart classroom technologies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Education
Reference49 articles.
1. African Union (2018). Bridging continental and global education: Pan- African High-Level Conference on Education, Working documents. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/2018-04-23_en_pace_2018_working_documents_2304_rev.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2023.
2. African Union (2020). Building Innovative Education and Training Ecosystems to Create Impact at Scale: Africa Education Innovations Handbook. Retrieved from https://au.int/sites/default/files/documents/41358-doc-Africa_Education_Innovations_Handbook_2020_EN.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2023.
3. Al-Azawei, A., & Lundqvist, K. (2015). Learner differences in perceived satisfaction of an online learning: An extension to the technology acceptance model in an Arabic sample. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(5), 408–426. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1084245.pdf
4. Alyoussef, I. Y. (2021). E-learning acceptance: The role of task–technology fit as sustainability in higher education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116450
5. Annamdevula, S., & Bellamkonda, R. S. (2016). The effects of service quality on student loyalty: The mediating role of student satisfaction. Journal of Modelling in Management, 11(2), 446–462. https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-04-2014-0031
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献