1. Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M. C. (2001). In Anderson, & D. R. Krathwohl (Eds.), A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. L. W.
2. Ancliff, M., & Kang, A. (2017). Flipping an EMI physics class: Implications of student motivation and learning strategies for the design of course contents. International Journal of Contents, 13(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2017.13.4.001.
3. Barnard, M., Dehon, E., Compretta, C., Notebaert, A., Sparkmon, W., Meyer, E., & Rockhold, R. (2020). Development of a competency model and tailored assessment method for high school science teachers utilizing a flipped learning approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 2595–2614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09782-5.
4. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2014). Flipped learning: Gateway to student engagement. International Society for Technology in Education.
5. Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2014). Problem posing: Reflections and applications. Psychology Press.