Abstract
AbstractThe emergence of Educational Robotics (ER) and its rapid spread across all levels of education in recent years has drawn attention to the need for further training in this discipline. In this study we discuss the panorama of teacher training research in ER and make recommendations for institutions that intend to implement ER teacher training programs. We explore three databases that include publications in ER teacher training and select 38 publications for analysis. We discuss these publications with special emphasis on requirements, durations, trainer and trainee profiles, pedagogical approaches and best practices. Our main findings are the lack of uniformity regarding the duration and requirements of training programs and the fact that information on trainer and trainee profiles is not always documented. ER teacher training programs are often not founded on theory. When they are based on pedagogical principles, however, these are usually constructivism/constructionism, inquiry-based learning or project-based learning. The most prominent best practices for ER teacher training fall into five categories: collaboration, materials, pedagogy, practice and feedback/support. Our recommendations will help to improve the content, structure and implementation of future ER teacher training programs and the reliability and generalizability of research results and design.
Funder
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Library and Information Sciences,Education
Reference48 articles.
1. Agatolio, F., Pivetti, M., Di Battista, S., Menegatti, E., & Moro, M. (2017). A training course in educational robotics for learning support teachers. In D. Alimisis, M. Moro, & E. Menegatti (Eds.), Educational robotics in the makers era (pp. 43–57). Cham: Springer.
2. Alimisis, D. (2014). Educational robotics in teacher education: An innovative tool for promoting quality education. In L. Daniela, I. Lūka, L. Rutka, & I. Žogla (Eds.), Teacher of the 21st century: Quality education for quality teaching (pp. 14–27). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
3. Alimisis, D. (2019). Teacher training in educational robotics : The ROBOESL project paradigm. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24(2), 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9357-0.
4. Alimisis, D., Frangou, S., & Papanikolaou, K. (2009). A constructivist methodology for teacher training in educational robotics: The TERECoP course in Greece through trainees ’ eyes. In 2009 ninth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 24–28). Riga: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICALT.2009.86.
5. Altin, H., & Pedaste, M. (2013). Learning approaches to applying robotics in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 12(3), 365–377.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献