1. A. E. Anikaev, V. G. Chalyan, and N. V. Meishvili, “A comparative study of the cognitive abilities of hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in the solution of manipulation tasks,” Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Univ. Ser. XXIII Antropol., 4, 93–102 (2013).
2. A. E. Anikaev, V. G. Chalyan, and N. V. Meishvili, “A comparative study of the ability to solve tasks of the Piaget ‘A not B error’ type in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas),” in: From the Beginnings to the Present. 130 Years of the Organization of the Psychological Society at Moscow University: Proc. Jubilee Conf. (2015), Vol. 5, pp. 401–403.
3. A. E. Anikaev, V. G. Chalyan, and N. V. Meishvili, “A comparative study of the ability to make conscious choices in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas),” Vestn. Mosk. Gos. Univ. Ser. XXIII Antropol., 4, 74–87 (2014).
4. Z. A. Zorina and A. A. Smirnova, “History and methods in the experimental study of thought in animals,” in: Contemporary Experimental Psychology, V. A. Barabanshchikov (ed.), Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences Press, Moscow (2000).
5. W. Köhler, The Mentality of Apes [Russian translation], Communist Academy Press, Moscow (1930).