Abstract
AbstractThe possibility of domain restrictions that allow the consistent use of majority-based aggregators for rankings of objects has been widely explored. This paper extends this exploration to structures in which equivalence relations or classifications are aggregated, and shows that there is very limited scope for such restrictions in the binary structure of Mirkin and in the unary structure of Maniquet and Mongin. We develop a hybrid structure that combines binary and unary conditions on the aggregator, and that allows the use of a majority-based aggregator if and only if each object is eligible for inclusion in no more than two categories out of some greater number. We also show that in many circumstances, the surjectivity requirement of Maniquet and Mongin implicitly introduces binary conditions on the aggregator, and that their structure is entailed by the hybrid structure introduced here.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference21 articles.
1. Adorno TW (1939, 1989) On Jazz, in Discourse 12, 45-69. Translated by Jamie Owen Daniel. Über Jazz was first published in 1936 under the pseudonym Hektor Rottweiler
2. Arrow KJ (1951) Social choice and individual values: Cowles Foundation monograph 12. John Wiley, New York
3. Burge T (1979) Individualism and the Mental. Midwest Stud Philos 4:73–121
4. Burge T (1986) Intellectual Norms and Foundations of Mind. J Philos 83:697–720
5. Craven J (1996) Majority-consistent preference orderings. Soc Choice Welf 13:259–67
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Aggregation of ranked categories;Mathematical Social Sciences;2024-05
2. Classification aggregation without unanimity;Mathematical Social Sciences;2024-03