Databases, Science Communication, and the Division of Epistemic Labour

Author:

Mößner NicolaORCID

Abstract

AbstractThere are many ways in which biases can enter processes of scientific reasoning. One of these is what Ludwik Fleck has called a “harmony of illusions”. In this paper, Fleck’s ideas on the relevance of social mechanisms in epistemic processes and his detailed description of publication processes in science will be used as a starting point to investigate the connection between cognitive processes, social dynamics, and biases in this context.Despite its usefulness as a first step towards a more detailed analysis, Fleck’s account needs to be updated in order to take the developments of digital communication technologies of the 21st century into account. Taking a closer look at today’s practices of science communication shows that information and communication technologies (ICTs) play a major role here. By presenting a detailed case study concerning the database SCOPUS, the question will be investigated how such ICTs can influence the division of epistemic labour. The result will be that they potentially undermine the epistemic benefits of social dynamics in science communication due to their inherent tendency to reduce the diversity of scientific hypotheses and ideas.

Funder

Universität Stuttgart

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Philosophy,Mathematics (miscellaneous)

Reference44 articles.

1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) (2022) Wissenschaftliches Publizieren als Grundlage und Gestaltungsfeld der Wissenschaftsbewertung Herausforderungen und Handlungsfelder.https://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/foerderung/grundlagen_dfg_foerderung/publikationswesen/positionspapier_publikationswesen.pdf

2. Douglas HE (2009) Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pa

3. Elsevier ed (2020) Scopus. Content Coverage Guide.https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/Scopus_ContentCoverage_Guide_WEB.pdf

4. Fleck L (1979) Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Edited by Trenn TJ, Merton RK, translated by Bradley F, Trenn TJ, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press

5. Fleck L (1986). “The Problem of Epistemology [1936]”. In: Fleck L, Cognition and Fact. Materials on Ludwik Fleck, edited by Cohen RS, Schnelle T, Dordrecht : Reidel, pp. 79–112

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3