Abstract
AbstractCategorization of technologies by the order of their inbetweenness is a useful device for parsing complex structures info fundamental parts and understanding the application of a technology. This promises a coherent foundation for explaining how we deploy technologies in design, in particular with respect to the affordances they create. By connecting the categorization of technologies to the matching of user effectivities to features of the environment in affordances, the paper proposes an approach to the transparent description of the assemblages produced by design in terms of which technologies are involved and how they connect to each other, to the wider environment and to users. For affordances, this improves specificity concerning the features of the environment that are directly relevant to an interaction and the connections between these features and the rest of the environment. With respect to technologies, it helps understand not only why a technology may be used under certain circumstances but also abuse and underperformance. Finally, it supports design by providing means for parsing complex situations into chains of technologies between animals and environments. This helps explain how technologies modify effectivities, environments or relations between the two and how this affects design performance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Blazewick DH, Chounthirath T, Hodges NL, Collins CL, Smith GA (2018) Stair-related injuries treated in United States emergency departments. Am J Emerg Med 36(4):608–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.034
2. Chemero A (2003) An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol Psychol 15(2):181–195
3. Choi S, Fara MF (2021) Dispositions. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/dispositions/. 2022
4. Cormier P, Olewnik A, Lewis K (2014) Toward a formalization of affordance modeling for engineering design. Res Eng Design 25(3):259–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-014-0179-3
5. Cosgrove D (2003) Ptolemy and Vitruvius: spatial representation in the sixteenth-century texts and commentaries. In: Picon A, Ponte A (eds) Architecture and the sciences: exchanging metaphors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 20–51
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献