Technologies, Inbetweenness and Affordances

Author:

Koutamanis AlexanderORCID

Abstract

AbstractCategorization of technologies by the order of their inbetweenness is a useful device for parsing complex structures info fundamental parts and understanding the application of a technology. This promises a coherent foundation for explaining how we deploy technologies in design, in particular with respect to the affordances they create. By connecting the categorization of technologies to the matching of user effectivities to features of the environment in affordances, the paper proposes an approach to the transparent description of the assemblages produced by design in terms of which technologies are involved and how they connect to each other, to the wider environment and to users. For affordances, this improves specificity concerning the features of the environment that are directly relevant to an interaction and the connections between these features and the rest of the environment. With respect to technologies, it helps understand not only why a technology may be used under certain circumstances but also abuse and underperformance. Finally, it supports design by providing means for parsing complex situations into chains of technologies between animals and environments. This helps explain how technologies modify effectivities, environments or relations between the two and how this affects design performance.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference38 articles.

1. Blazewick DH, Chounthirath T, Hodges NL, Collins CL, Smith GA (2018) Stair-related injuries treated in United States emergency departments. Am J Emerg Med 36(4):608–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.034

2. Chemero A (2003) An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecol Psychol 15(2):181–195

3. Choi S, Fara MF (2021) Dispositions. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/dispositions/. 2022

4. Cormier P, Olewnik A, Lewis K (2014) Toward a formalization of affordance modeling for engineering design. Res Eng Design 25(3):259–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-014-0179-3

5. Cosgrove D (2003) Ptolemy and Vitruvius: spatial representation in the sixteenth-century texts and commentaries. In: Picon A, Ponte A (eds) Architecture and the sciences: exchanging metaphors. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 20–51

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Stair Design and User Interaction;Architecture;2024-09-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3