1. Zaidi H, Montandon M-L, Alavi A. The clinical role of fusion imaging using PET, CT, and MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2010-2;18:133–49.
2. Ripa RS, Knudsen A, Hag AMF, Lebech A-M, Loft A, Keller SH, Hansen AE, von Benzon E, Højgaard L, Kjær A. Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;3:361–71.
3. Li X, Heber D, Rausch I, et al. Quantitative assessment of atherosclerotic plaques on (18)F-FDG PET/MRI: comparison with a PET/CT hybrid system. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1503–12.
4. Hyafil F, Schindler A, Sepp D, et al. High-risk plaque features can be detected in non-stenotic carotid plaques of patients with ischaemic stroke classified as cryptogenic using combined (18)F-FDG PET/MR imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:270–9.
5. Durrani AK, Lau JM, Laforest R, Zheng J, Priatna A, Gropler RJ, Woodard PK (2015) 13N–ammonia PET/MR Myocardial Stress Perfusion Imaging Early Experience. Radiological Society of North America, 2015 Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting; 2015 Dec 3; Chicago, IL. Available from: http://archive.rsna.org/2015/15012463.html .