On the identity of two solution algorithms of the ‘improved normalized squared differences’ matrix adjustment model

Author:

Revesz TamasORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe paper is a supplement for an article recently published in this journal. That paper proved that if the sign-preservation requirement is dropped then the solution of the so-called improved normalized squared differences (INSD) two-directional matrix adjustment model is the same as the result of the ‘additive correction iteration algorithm’ which the author has been using successfully for decades. It also argued that if the sign-preservation requirement is dropped then the iteration procedure suggested by the authors of the INSD-model boils down to the same algorithm. Since the formal proof of this statement was not available at the time, in this paper the author duly publishes the three-and-a-half pages long proof he elaborated. In the conclusion the merit of this and similar, yet barely rigorously analysed iteration algorithms and the possible useful extensions are also outlined.

Funder

Corvinus University of Budapest

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3