Suggestion for Determining Treatment Strategies in Dental Ethics

Author:

Kovács Szilárd D.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractContemporary medicine views health as the individual’s physical, mental, and social well-being. Oral health plays a crucial role in one’s well-being, as the oral cavity and its surrounding regions execute essential functions in verbal and nonverbal communication, sensing, digestion, and significantly contribute to aesthetic appearance. The multifaceted nature of the notion of oral health, as well as the patient’s needs and autonomous will result in various treatment options for the same oral state, favouring often contrasting ethical values and different aspects of oral health. The objective of this article is to suggest alternative treatment strategies in dentistry with respect to the following factors: extent of rehabilitation, preserving one’s anatomical structures, aesthetic outcome, number of sessions, patient autonomy. Additionally, this article describes the suggested treatment strategies in an ethical context and determines the conditions of their employment. The suggested treatment strategies are divided in two categories, extensive treatment strategies focusing on the patient’s entire craniofacial complex, while specific treatment strategies focus on specific paramount issues.

Funder

Semmelweis University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference26 articles.

1. Allen, P.F., and A.S. McMillan. 2003. Review of the functional and psychosocial outcomes of edentulousness treated with complete replacement. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 69: 662.

2. Asscher, E.C.A., I. Bolt, and M. Schermer. 2012. Wish-fulfilling medicine in practice: A qualitative study of physician arguments. Journal of Medical Ethics 38: 327–331.

3. Artun, J. 2002. The role of minimal intervention in orthodontics. Medical Principles and Practice 11(S1): 7–15.

4. Barnes, J.J., S. Patel, and F. Mannocci. 2010. Why do general dental practitioners refer to a specific specialist endodontist in practice? International Endodontic Journal 44: 21–32.

5. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 1979. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3