Going the Distance

Author:

Sassano AngieORCID,Mayes Christopher,Kerridge Ian,Lipworth Wendy

Abstract

AbstractQualitative studies on assisted reproductive technology commonly focus on the perspectives of participants living in major metropolises. In doing so, the experiences of those living outside major cities, and the unique way conditions of spatiality shape access to treatment, are elided. In this paper, we examine how location and regionality in Australia impact upon access and experience of reproductive services. We conducted twelve qualitative interviews with participants residing in regional areas across Australia. We asked participants to discuss their experience with assisted reproduction services and the impacts of location on access, service choice, and experience of care, and analysed the data using reflexive thematic analysis, as outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006, 2019). Participants in this study reported that their location impacted the services available to them, required considerable time in travel, and reduced continuity of care. We draw on these responses to examine the ethical implications of uneven distribution of reproductive services in commercial healthcare settings which rely on market-based mechanisms.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

Deakin University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference37 articles.

1. Australian Medical Association (AMA). 2019. 2019 AMA rural health issues survey. May 16. https://www.ama.com.au/articles/2019-ama-rural-health-issues-survey.

2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2022a. National, state and territory population, September 2021. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/national-state-and-territory-population/sep-2021.

3. ———. 2022b. Regional population, 2020–21 financial year. https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/regional-population/2020-21

4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2019. Rural and remote health. https://web.archive.org/web/20200214010209/https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-health/rural-remote-health/contents/rural-health.

5. Bourke, L., J.S. Humphreys, J. Wakerman, and J. Taylor. 2012. Understanding rural and remote health: A framework for analysis in Australia. Health and Place 18(3): 496–503.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Far From the Madding Crowd: Health Service Expectations in the “Country”;Journal of Bioethical Inquiry;2023-06

2. Lead Essay—Rural Bioethics;Journal of Bioethical Inquiry;2023-05-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3