The Lady Vanishes: What’s Missing from the Stem Cell Debate-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

The Lady Vanishes: What’s Missing from the Stem Cell Debate

Published:2006-07-15 Issue:1-2 Volume:3 Page:43-54
ISSN:1176-7529
Container-title:Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
language:en
Short-container-title:Bioethical Inquiry

Author:

Dickenson Donna L.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11673-006-9003-8.pdf

Reference65 articles.

1. Boyle, J. (2003). The second enclosure movement and the construction of the public domain. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 33–74.

2. Brace, L. (1994). The politics of property: Labour, freedom and belonging. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

3. CCNE (Comite Consultatif National d’Ethique) (2002). Umbilical cord blood banks for autologous use or for research. Paris: CCNE

4. CCNE (Comite Consultatif National d’Ethique) and Nationaler Ethikrat. Opinion no. 77 (2003). Ethical problems raised by the collected biological material and associated information data: ‘Biobanks’, ‘biolibraries’. Paris: CCNE.

5. Cohen, G. A. (1997). Self-ownership, freedom and equality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cited by 84 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Redefining Bioavailability through Migrant Egg Donors in Spain;Body & Society;2023-03

2. The Invisible Patient: Concerns about Donor Exploitation in Stem Cell Research;Health Care Analysis;2022-11-25

3. Index;Biopolitical Futures in Twenty-First-Century Speculative Fiction;2021-10-31

4. Bibliography;Biopolitical Futures in Twenty-First-Century Speculative Fiction;2021-10-31

5. Notes;Biopolitical Futures in Twenty-First-Century Speculative Fiction;2021-10-31