Ethical Design and Use of Robotic Care of the Elderly

Author:

Johnston CarolynORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe Australian Royal Commission into Aged Care Quality and Safety acknowledged understaffing and substandard care in residential aged care and home care services, and recommendations were made that that the Australian Government should promote assistive technology within aged care. Robotic care assistants can provide care and companionship for the elderly—both in their own homes and within health and aged care institutions. Although more research is required into their use, studies indicate benefits, including enabling the elderly to live independently at home, assistance with medication and monitoring of safety. Nevertheless, there are inherent ethical challenges in the use of robots as carers, including loss of privacy, unwarranted restrictions on autonomy, lack of dignity, deception, and the exacerbation of loneliness. Ethics by design can counter these issues in development of robotics and clinical ethics committees have been put forward as a way of dealing with the ethical use of robotic care in healthcare institutions. In this paper I outline the ethical challenges of robotic care assistants and how these may be mediated in their design and use.

Funder

University of Tasmania

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference10 articles.

1. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. 2021. Older Australians [website]. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare, November 18. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/older-people/older-australia-at-a-glance/contents/summary. Accessed December 23, 2021.

2. Blake, V.K. 2020. Regulating care robots. Temple Law Review 92(3): 551-594.

3. Dawson, D., Schleiger, E. Horton, J. et al. 2019. Artificial intelligence: Australia’s ethics framework—A discussion paper. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation. https://apo.org.au/node/229596. Accessed December 16, 2021.

4. Dignum, V., M. Baldoni, C. Baroglio, et al. 2018. Ethics by design: Necessity or curse? AIES '18: Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 60– 66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278721.3278745

5. European Parliament. 2017. REPORT with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0005_EN.pdf. Accessed December 23, 2021.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3