Author:
Allen Jemima W.,Gyngell Christopher,Koplin Julian J.,Vears Danya F.
Abstract
AbstractRecently, Australia became the second jurisdiction worldwide to legalize the use of mitochondrial donation technology. The Mitochondrial Donation Law Reform (Maeve’s Law) Bill 2021 allows individuals with a family history of mitochondrial disease to access assisted reproductive techniques that prevent the inheritance of mitochondrial disease. Using inductive content analysis, we assessed submissions sent to the Senate Committee as part of a programme of scientific inquiry and public consultation that informed drafting of the Bill. These submissions discussed a range of bioethical and legal considerations of central importance to the political debate. Significantly, submissions from those with a first-hand experience of mitochondrial disease, including clinicians and those with a family history of mitochondrial disease, were in strong support of this legislation. Those in support of the Bill commended the two-staged approach and rigorous licencing requirements as part of the Bill’s implementation strategy. Submissions which outlined arguments against the legislation either opposed the use of these techniques in general or opposed aspects of the implementation strategy in Australia. These findings offer a window into the ethical arguments and perspectives that matter most to those Australians who took part in the Senate inquiry into mitochondrial donation. The insights garnered from these submissions may be used to help refine policy and guidelines as the field progresses.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science)
Reference13 articles.
1. Appleby, J.B. 2018. Should Mitochondrial Donation Be Anonymous? The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 43(2): 261–280.
2. Brandt, R. 2018. Mandatory sex selection and mitochondrial transfer. Bioethics 32(7): 437–444.
3. Cavaliere, G., and C. Palacios-González. 2018. Lesbian motherhood and mitochondrial replacement techniques: Reproductive freedom and genetic kinship. Journal of Medical Ethics 44(12): 835–842.
4. Commonwealth of Australia. 2021. Mitochondrial Donation Law Reform (Maeve’s Law) Bill 2021 Explanatory Memorandum. https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/download/legislation/ems/r6697_ems_34f56965-6288-4da6-9a02-096f5b58d3c1/upload_pdf/JC001678.pdf;fileType=application%2Fpdf#search=%22legislation/ems/r6697_ems_34f56965-6288-4da6-9a02-096f5b58d3c1%22. Accessed June 20, 2022.
5. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). 2022. Previous responses to FOI requests April 2021 - March 2022. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Last modified March 2022. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/about-us/freedom-ofinformation/previous-responses-to-foi-requests/. Accessed 20 Jun 2022.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献