Abstract
AbstractEthical perspectives on regional, rural, and remote healthcare often, understandably and importantly, focus on inequities in access to services. In this commentary, we take the opportunity to examine the implications of normalizing metrocentric views, values, knowledge, and orientations, evidenced by the recent (2022) New South Wales inquiry into health outcomes and access to hospital and health services in regional, rural and remote New South Wales, for contemporary rural governance and justice debates. To do this, we draw on the feminist inspired approach to rural health ethics involving analysis of power relationships developed by Simpson and McDonald and related ideas from critical health sociology. In presenting this analysis, we extend contemporary thought about spatial health inequities and structural violence.
Funder
Queensland University of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science)
Reference26 articles.
1. Ayres, J. 1994. 1993 Le Tourneau Award: The use and abuse of medical practice guidelines. Journal of Legal Medicine 15(3): 421–443.
2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2022. Rural & remote health. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/rural-remote-australians/rural-and-remote-health. Accessed July 10, 2022.
3. Bambra, C. 2022. Placing intersectional inequalities in health. Health & Place 75: 102761.
4. Barnett, R., and P. Barnett. 2003. “If you want to sit on your butts you’ll get nothing!” Community activism in response to threats of rural hospital closure in southern New Zealand. Health and Place 9(2): 59–71.
5. Cho, S., K. Crenshaw, and L. McCall. 2013. Toward a field of intersectional studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 38(4): 785–810.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献