Clinical Ethics Consultations in the Opinion of Polish Physicians

Author:

Czarkowski MarekORCID,Różyńska JoannaORCID,Maćkiewicz BartoszORCID,Zawiła-Niedźwiecki JakubORCID

Abstract

AbstractClinical Ethics Consultations (CEC) are an important tool for physicians in solving difficult cases. They are extremely common in North America and to a lesser extent also present in Europe. However, there is little data on this practice in Poland. We present results of a survey of 521 physicians practising in Poland concerning their opinion on CECs and related practices. We analysed the data looking at such issues as CECs’ perceived availability, use of CECs, and perceived usefulness of such support. Physicians in our study generally encounter hard ethics cases, even—surprisingly—those who do not work in hospitals. Most physicians have no CEC access, and those that do still do not employ CECs. However, physicians perceive this form of support as useful—even more so among actual users of CECs. We compared these findings with similar studies from other European countries and the North America. We point out peculiarities of our results as compared to those in other countries, with some possible explanations. We hope the results may encourage regulatory debate on the need to formally introduce CECs into the Polish healthcare system.

Funder

National Endowment for Humanities

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference50 articles.

1. Act of 12th September 1990 on higher education. Journal of Laws 1990 No. 65 Pos. 385. 1990.

2. Act of 6 November 2008 on accreditation in healthcare. Journal of Laws 52, Pos. 418.

3. Arnold, R., A. Frolic, M.V. Rorty, et al. 2011. Core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation. Chicago, Il.

4. Aulisio, M.P. 2003. Meeting the need: Ethics consultation in health care today. In Ethics consultations. From theory to practice, edited by M.P. Aulisio, R.M. Arnold, and S.J. Youngner, 3–22. Baltimore.

5. Borovečki, A., S. Orešković, and H. ten Have. 2005. Ethics and the structures of health care in the European countries in transition: hospital ethics committees in Croatia. BMJ 331: 227–229.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3