Data Sharing During Pandemics: Reciprocity, Solidarity, and Limits to Obligations

Author:

Silva Diego S.ORCID,Smith Maxwell J.

Abstract

AbstractSouth Africa shared with the world the warning of a new strain of SARS-CoV2, Omicron, in November 2021. As a result, many high-income countries (HICs) instituted complete travel bans on persons leaving South Africa and other neighbouring countries. These bans were unnecessary from a scientific standpoint, and they ran counter to the International Health Regulations. In short, South Africa was penalized for sharing data. Data sharing during pandemics is commonly justified by appeals to solidarity. In this paper, we argue that solidarity is, at best, an aspirational ideal to work toward but that it cannot ground an obligation to share data. Instead, low-and-middle income countries (LIMCs) should be guided by the principle of reciprocity, which states that we ought to return good for good received. Reciprocity is necessarily a conditional principle. LMICs, we argue, should only share data during future pandemics on the condition that HICs provide enforceable assurances that the benefits of data sharing will be equitably distributed and that LMICs won’t be penalized for sharing information.

Funder

University of Sydney

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science)

Reference24 articles.

1. Becker L. 1990. Reciprocity. Chicago, US: Chicago University Press.

2. Freudenthal E. 2019. Ebola’s lost blood: Row over samples flown out of Africa as “big pharma” set to cash in. The Telegraph, February 6. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/science-and-disease/ebolas-lost-blood-row-samples-flown-africa-big-pharma-set-cash/. Accessed December 13, 2022.

3. Jackson, C., R. Habibi, L. Forma, D. Silva, and M. Smith. 2022. Between rules and resistance: Moving public health emergency responses beyond fear, racism and greed. BMJ Global Health 7: e009945.

4. Jennings, B., and A. Dawson. 2015. Solidarity in the moral imagination of bioethics. Hastings Center Report 45(5): 31–38.

5. Khan, T., S. Abimbola, C. Kyobutungi, et al. 2022. How we classify countries and people—and why it matters. BMJ Global Health 7: e009704.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3