Author:
Rogers Wendy A.,Johnson Jane
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Health Policy,Health (social science)
Reference25 articles.
1. Barkun, J.S., J.K. Aronson, L.S. Feldman, et al. 2009. Surgical innovation and evaluation 1: Evaluation and stages of surgical innovations. The Lancet 374(9695): 1089–1096.
2. Bell, E., G. Mathieu, and E. Racine. 2009. Preparing the ethical future of deep brain stimulation. Surgical Neurology 72(6): 577–586.
3. Biffl, W.L., D.A. Spain, A.M. Reitsma, et al. 2008. Responsible development and application of surgical innovations: A position statement of the society of university surgeons. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 206(3): 1204–1209.
4. Brody, H., and F.G. Miller. 2003. The clinician–investigator: Unavoidable but manageable tension. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13(40): 329–346.
5. Dana, J. 2009. How psychological research can inform policies for dealing with conflicts of interest in medicine. In Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice, ed. B. Lo and M.J. Field, 358–374. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献