Ethical Stakes for Past, Present, and Prospective Tuberculosis Isolate Research Towards a Multicultural Data Sovereignty Model for Isolate Samples in Research

Author:

Anderson A.ORCID,Meher M.,Maroof Z.,Malua S.,Tahapeehi C.,Littleton J.,Arcus V.,Wade J.,Park J.

Abstract

AbstractTuberculosis (TB) is a potentially fatal infectious disease that, in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), inequitably affects Asian, Pacific, Middle Eastern, Latin American, and African (MELAA), and Māori people. Medical research involving genome sequencing of TB samples enables more nuanced understanding of disease strains and their transmission. This could inform highly specific health interventions. However, the collection and management of TB isolate samples for research are currently informed by monocultural biomedical models often lacking key ethical considerations. Drawing on a qualitative kaupapa Māori–consistent study, this paper reports on preliminary discussions with groups of Māori, Pacific, and Afghan people in NZ, whose communities have been harmed by TB and TB stigma. Participants’ discussions highlight key concerns and meanings that ought to inform the development of guidelines and a more robust consultative process for the governance of how TB isolate samples are collected and used both retrospectively and in future research. We argue for ethical processes to be culturally nuanced and community-generated, flexible and meaningful, and situated in relation to the physical and symbolic effects of TB. We discuss the significance of Indigenous data sovereignty, rights, and kāwanatanga (governorship) in shaping a multicultural data sovereignty model.

Funder

Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust

University of Auckland

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference33 articles.

1. Anderson, A. 2008a. Mark of shame: Social stigma, tuberculosis and Asian immigrants to New Zealand. In Multiplying and dividing: TB in Canada and Aotearoa New Zealand, edited by J. Park, A. Herring, J. Littleton, and T. Farmer, 196–204. Auckland: University of Auckland.

2. ———. 2008b. Understanding migrants’ primary healthcare utilisation in New Zealand through an ethnographic approach. Diversity in Health and Social Care 5(4):291–301.

3. Badu, E., C. Mpofu, and P. Farvid. 2018a. Is New Zealand immigration policy a barrier to TB elimination? The New Zealand Medical Journal 131(1477): 120–122.

4. ———. 2018b. Towards TB elimination in Aotearoa/New Zealand: Key informant insights on the determinants of TB among African migrants. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease 3(2):44

5. Boulton, A., M. Hudson, A. Ahuriri-Driscoll, and A. Stewart. 2014. Enacting Kaitiakitanga: Challenges and complexities in the governance and ownership of Rongoa research information. International Indigenous Policy Journal 5(2): 1–18.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3