Microarray-Based Cytogenetics
Publisher
Springer New York
Reference82 articles.
1. Bui T-H, Vetro A, Zuffardi O, Shaffer LG. Current controversies in prenatal diagnosis 3: is conventional chromosome analysis necessary in the post-array CGH era? Prenat Diagn. 2011;31(3):235–43.
2. Neill NJ, Ballif BC, Lamb AN, Parikh S, Ravnan JB, Schultz R, et al. Recurrence, submicroscopic complexity, and potential clinical relevance of copy gains detected by array CGH that are shown to be unbalanced insertions by FISH. Genome Res. 2011;21(4):535–44.
3. Cross J, Peters G, Wu Z, Brohede J, Hannan GN. Resolution of trisomic mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis: estimated performance of a 50 K SNP microarray. Prenat Diagn. 2007;27(13):1197–204.
4. Neill NJ, Torchia BS, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG, Ballif BC. Comparative analysis of copy number detection by whole-genome BAC and oligonucleotide array CGH. Mol Cytogenet. 2010;3:11–24.
5. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman F, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science. 1992;258(5083): 818–21.