Beyond ‘migrant background’: how to select relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories in educational research

Author:

Vietze JanaORCID,Schwarzenthal Miriam,Moffitt Ursula,Civitillo Sauro

Abstract

Abstract Across continental Europe, educational research samples are often divided by ‘migrant background’, a binary variable criticized for masking participant heterogeneity and reinforcing exclusionary norms of belonging. This study endorses more meaningful, representative, and precise research by offering four guiding questions for selecting relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories for collecting and analysing data in psychological and educational research. Using a preregistered empirical example, we first compare selected social categories (‘migrant background’, family heritage, religion, citizenship, cultural identification, and generation status) in their potential to reveal participant heterogeneity. Second, we investigate differences in means and relations between variables (discrimination experiences, perceived societal Islamophobia, and national identity) and academic motivation among 1335 adolescents in Germany (48% female, Mage = 14.69). Regression analyses and multigroup SEM revealed differential experiences with and implications of discrimination for academic motivation. Results highlight the need for a deliberate, transparent use of social categories to make discrimination visible and centre participants’ subjective experiences.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Reference62 articles.

1. Ahrens, P.-A. (2018). Islam und Musliminnen in Deutschland: Die Sicht der Bevölkerung: Ergebnisse einer bundesweiten Umfrage [Islam and Muslims in Germany: The perspective of the populace: Results of a national survey]. https://www.ekd.de/umfrage-positionspapier-islam-zusammenfassung-37824.htm

2. Aikman, S., Robinson-Pant, A., McGrath, S., Jere, C. M., Cheffy, I., Themelis, S., & Rogers, A. (2016). Challenging deficit discourses in international education and development. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 46(2), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2016.1134954

3. Armenta, B. E., Lee, R. M., Pituc, S. T., Jung, K.-R., Park, I. J., Soto, J. A., Kim, S. Y., & Schwartz, S. J. (2013). Where are you from? A validation of the Foreigner Objectification Scale and the psychological correlates of foreigner objectification among Asian Americans and Latinos. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 19(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031547

4. Artamonova, O. (2018). Teacher’s ethnic teasing: Playing with ambiguity and exploiting in-group communication. Discourse & Society, 29(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517726113

5. Bos, W., Lankes, E.-M., Prenzel, M., Schwippert, K., Valtin, R., & Walther, G. (2007). Erste Ergebnisse aus IGLU. Schülerleistungen am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe im internationalen Vergleich [First results from the IGLU study: student achievement at the end of fourth grade in international comparison]. Sozialwissenschaftlicher Fachinformationsdienst SoFid, Bildungsforschung 2007/1, 9–46.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3